Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Alterations in osteoclast function and phenotype induced by different inhibitors of bone resorption - implications for osteoclast quality

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Davey
30 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Bradley
3 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anita Undale
19 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Gingery
23 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anita Vibsig Neutzsky-Wulff
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anita Vibsig Neutzsky-Wulff
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Davey
24 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Bradley
26 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Gingery
27 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anita Vibsig Neutzsky-Wulff
Resubmission - Version 4
27 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-11-109

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement