Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Inter-rater reliability of three standardized functional tests in patients with low back pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Johan Tidstrand
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donald Murphy
4 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Treny Sasyniuk
5 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ville Leinonen
16 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Johan Tidstrand
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ville Leinonen
9 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donald Murphy
10 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Treny Sasyniuk
25 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Johan Tidstrand
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Treny Sasyniuk
11 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Johan Tidstrand
Resubmission - Version 5
11 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Johan Tidstrand
Resubmission - Version 6
20 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-10-58

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement