Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johan Hviid Andersen
28 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julius Sim
1 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Birgitta Wiitavaara
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johan Hviid Andersen
19 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julius Sim
13 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Birgitta Wiitavaara
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Birgitta Wiitavaara
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Birgitta Wiitavaara
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
5 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Birgitta Wiitavaara
Resubmission - Version 9
5 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
9 Mar 2009 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-10-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement