Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - C. Philip Gabel
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Doward
15 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ring
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - C. Philip Gabel
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ring
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
26 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - C. Philip Gabel
Resubmission - Version 9
26 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
9 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - C. Philip Gabel
Resubmission - Version 11
9 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
18 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
18 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-10-161

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement