Differences between native and prosthetic knees in terms of cross-sectional morphology of the femoral trochlea: a study based on three-dimensional models and virtual total knee arthroplasty
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 September 2016
Accepted: 10 April 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josh R Baxter|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Thoreson|
|27 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Zhe Du|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Thoreson|
|8 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Zhe Du|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Thoreson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1529-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.