Arthroscopic release using F and C method versus conventional open release method in the treatment of gluteal muscle contracture: a comparative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 January 2017
Accepted: 9 March 2017
Published: 16 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olufemi Ayeni|
|27 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefan Rahm|
|24 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saroj Rai|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefan Rahm|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olufemi Ayeni|
|8 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saroj Rai|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1484-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.