Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders20089:73

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-73

Received: 27 December 2007

Accepted: 24 May 2008

Published: 24 May 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james Wright
20 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randy Loder
30 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Dirk Stengel
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james Wright
8 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Dirk Stengel
Resubmission - Version 4
8 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 May 2008 Editorially accepted
24 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-73

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
AO Foundation, Clinical Investigation and Documentation
(2)
Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Centre Utrecht
(3)
Center for Clinical Research, Depts of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin and University of Greifswald

Advertisement