Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants
© Hanson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 27 December 2007
Accepted: 24 May 2008
Published: 24 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Dec 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - james Wright|
|20 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Randy Loder|
|30 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Dirk Stengel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - james Wright|
|8 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Dirk Stengel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|24 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-9-73|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.