Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 9, Article number: 154 (2008) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure in the US. It is important to have a comprehensive inpatient TKA program which maximizes outcomes while minimizing adverse events. The purpose of this study was to describe a TKA program – the Joint Replacement Program (JRP) – and report post-surgical outcomes.

Methods

74 candidates for a primary TKA were enrolled in the JRP. The JRP was designed to minimize complications and optimize patient-centered outcomes using a team approach including the patient, patient's family, and a multidisciplinary team of health professionals. The JRP consisted of a pre-operative class, standard pathways for medical care, comprehensive peri-operative pain management, aggressive physical therapy (PT), and proactive discharge planning. Measures included functional tests, knee range of motion (ROM), and medical record abstraction of patient demographics, length of stay, discharge disposition, and complications over a 6-month follow-up period.

Results

All patients achieved medical criteria for hospital discharge. The patients achieved the knee flexion ROM goal of 90° (91.7 ± 5.4°), but did not achieve the knee extension ROM goal of 0° (2.4 ± 2.6°). The length of hospital stay was two days for 53% of the patients, with 39% and 7% discharged in three and four days, respectively. All but three patients were discharged home with functional independence. 68% of these received outpatient physical therapy compared with 32% who received home physical therapy immediately after discharge. Two patients (< 3%) had medical complications during the inpatient hospital stay, and 9 patients (12%) had complications during the 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

The comprehensive JRP for TKA was associated with satisfactory clinical outcomes, short lengths of stay, a high percentage of patients discharged home with outpatient PT, and minimal complications. This JRP may represent an efficient, effective and safe protocol for providing care after a TKA.

Peer Review reports

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and successful surgical intervention for the management of disability secondary to osteoarthritis of the knee.[1] TKAs are associated with low peri-operative morbidity and improved pain and functional status.[2, 3] Over 400,000 TKAs were performed in the United States in 2005.[4] This number is expected to increase dramatically over the coming decades secondary to the success of the intervention and the aging "baby boomer" population.[4, 5]

The costs associated with TKAs (e.g. hospitalization, rehabilitation, etc.) are high. For example, Medicare reimburses over $2 billion each year for primary TKAs.[6, 7] Medicare reimbursement rates are often much lower than those billed by hospitals. In the 2006 fiscal year, the national average charge for TKAs (and total hip arthroplasties) was $38,447, yet the national average reimbursement was $11,916.[8] Because of this discrepancy, some hospitals are electing to eliminate total joint replacement surgeries from their list of provided services. For others, the need to efficiently utilize healthcare resources while optimizing patient outcomes when caring for patients after TKAs is obvious.[4] To accomplish this, an emphasis is placed on reducing lengths of hospital stays and minimizing peri-operative complications (e.g. hypoxia, infection, pneumonia, thrombosis, etc.) as means of managing the costs associated with TKAs. [9–11] Each of the following has a potential to minimize length of stay and/or post-operative complications in some manner: pre-operative education, [12–14] peri- and post-operative pain management, [15–17] clinical pathways, [18–20] early and aggressive rehabilitation including physical therapy (PT),[10, 21–24] and proactive discharge planning.[13, 25]

To our knowledge, there is no literature showing the effect(s) of a comprehensive program which incorporates all of these components. Hence, we developed an evidence-based, comprehensive program for the management of TKA and implemented it at a regional medical center. The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the joint replacement program (JRP) for TKA's and report post-surgical outcomes over 6 months of follow-up.

Methods

Study design and sample

The data for this study come from the JRP at Verde Valley Medical Center, a 99-bed regional medical center in the rural Southwest. 87 consecutive patients were candidates for and underwent a primary TKA between April 2006 and November 2007. Of these, 85% (n = 74) were enrolled in the JRP based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Criteria for inclusion included failed conservative management leading to painful and/or function-limiting osteoarthritis of the knee, clearance for surgery by primary care and/or medical specialists if indicated, the ability to participate in PT in a group environment during the hospital stay, and caregiver support at home. Exclusion criteria included chronic neurologic conditions such as post-stroke hemiparesis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, or any other condition which would preclude participation in group PT during the inpatient hospital stay. The primary reasons patients were not enrolled in the JRP were dementia or insufficient support at home. The nature, purpose and potential risks of the interventions were explained to each participant and written informed consent was obtained in accordance with procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northern Arizona Healthcare.

Joint Replacement Program

The JRP is a wellness-based program designed to optimize patient-centered outcomes and minimize complications for joint replacement. It was developed based on current evidence and expert opinion. Specifically, the JRP was modeled after published literature in pain management,[13, 16, 21, 23, 25] complication prevention,[23, 26] and cost containment after TKA.[25] Furthermore, the JRP was refined after visits to three "Centers for Excellence" in joint replacement throughout the country.

The JRP involves a multidisciplinary, coordinated team that includes the patient and patient's family, orthopedist, anesthesiologist, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, and case manager. The JRP consists of a pre-operative patient education and planning class, comprehensive peri- and post-operative pain management, standard pathways for medical care, aggressive rehabilitation/PT, and proactive discharge planning. The JRP includes clinical goals, including a two to three day hospital stay and discharge home with outpatient physical therapy.

Pre-Operative Care

Although published literature regarding the efficacy of pre-operative education is not conclusive, [12–14] a Cochrane Review concluded a positive association between pre-operative education and patient's anxiety.[14] The purpose of pre-operative education in the JRP was to lessen patients' anxiety by making them aware of post-operative rehabilitation and involving them in goal setting and discharge planning.

Patients attended a pre-operative educational session approximately 1–2 weeks prior to the scheduled surgery date. During this 4-hour class, patients were educated to the philosophy of the JRP, including aggressive, early rehabilitation to prevent complications and facilitate home discharge. The surgical procedure was described in detail with an emphasis on peri- and post-operative pain management. Patients were evaluated by anesthesiology for possible methods of sedation during surgery, and all necessary lab work and medical tests were completed. A physical therapist instructed the patients in the post-operative (hospital and home) exercise program (seated ankle pumps, assisted knee extension, assisted hamstring and calf stretches, and assisted heel slides) and PT goals for discharge from the hospital (Table 1). Additionally, performance (6 minute walk test [6MWT])[27] and self-administered (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS])[28] outcome measures were administered to establish a baseline to assess progress objectively.[29] A case manager discussed discharge planning, including expected length of hospital stay, post-discharge rehabilitation and medical care, potential adaptive equipment, home safety, and other discharge dispositions if discharge home was not possible. A tour of the orthopedic ward including the physical therapy room, patient rooms, and corridors was part of the session to allow the patients to become familiar with the post-operative environment. The patients were issued a notebook that contained a summary of relevant JRP information covered in the pre-operative visit.

Table 1 Physical therapy goals for discharge home
Full size table

Surgical Procedure and Intra-operative Care

Pre-operative medications included a long-acting oral opioid.[30] Patients were also given a Cox II non-steroidal anti-inflammatory,[30, 31] acetaminophen, anti-anxiety, and anti-emetic medications pre-operatively. Regional anesthesia has been associated with less intra-operative blood loss, lower incidence of DVT, and better post-operative pain management compared to general anesthesia.[31, 32] We hypothesized that fewer complications and better pain control would allow early mobilization. Therefore, a short-acting spinal anesthesia was used with all patients in the JRP.

The same orthopedist performed all TKAs reported herein using a standard para-medial approach with cruciate-sparing prostheses (PFC Sigma Knee System, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, IN);[12, 33, 34] care was taken to minimize the size of the incision. After components were cemented, an intra-operative, 100 cc intra-capsular injection was given for local pain control and consisted of bipuvicaine, epinephrine, soluble morphine sulphate, and normal saline. After the tourniquet was deflated, bleeding was minimized using electrocautery, and the incision was closed without a drain. Patients received one unit of autologous blood intra-operatively to minimize syncopal episodes.

Post-operative Care

Medical management

The prevention of complications while facilitating an early and safe discharge was a primary goal of the JRP. Patients were assessed daily by the treating orthopedist to evaluate progress and the risk for complications. Nursing care was delivered by a coordinated team of registered nurses and patient-care technicians with additional training in the JRP procedures. A clinical pathway was followed that included the pain management described above in addition to routine nursing care. Additionally, nurses encouraged patient independence with mobility and self care as indicated by the patient's abilities.

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was individualized for appropriate dose and complemented other pain management for the immediate post-operative period.[35] The PCA was discontinued on post-operative day (POD) #1, and pain was managed with oral medications as needed. The timing of oral pain medications was coordinated with PT appointments. Cryotherapy was initiated in the immediate post-operative period and was continued as needed for management of pain and swelling.[36]

Venous thromboprophylaxis included both mechanical and pharmacological management.[26] Mechanical treatment consisted of intermittent calf pump devices (SCD Expressâ„¢, Tyco Healthcare/Kendall, Mansfield, MA). Intermittent calf pumps were initiated on the non-operative leg pre-operatively and on the operative leg immediately after post-operative dressings were placed, and were maintained bilaterally throughout the hospital stay when the patient was in bed. Anti-embolism stockings (T.E.D.â„¢, Tyco Healthcare/Kendall, Mansfield, MA) were worn bilaterally for 6 weeks after surgery. Other mechanical management consisted of ambulation and range of motion (ROM) exercises on the day of surgery (POD #0), and hourly calf pumps. Pharmacological management consisted of a loading dose of Warfarin for anti-coagulation initiated in the recovery room and continued for a 14-day period. Prothrombin time and an international normalized ratio (INR) were completed at regular intervals during the 14-day period of anti-coagulation to maintain INR between 1.5 and 2.0.

Early, Aggressive Rehabilitation

There is consistent support in the literature for early and aggressive physical therapy, or mobilization, following TKA.[10, 21–25] Therefore, one of the cornerstones of the JRP was early and aggressive PT to maximize functional independence and achieve previously stated goals (Table 1). Physical therapy was typically initiated 2–4 hours after surgery. Vital signs and clinical signs and symptoms guided PT treatment and progression throughout the inpatient hospital stay. Physical therapy treatment on POD #0 optimally included an evaluation (review of physician's orders, past medical history, and patient's status), bed mobility and therapeutic exercise, transfers and full weight-bearing ambulation with an appropriate assistive device. Beginning on POD #1, patients were seen for PT twice per day in a group environment with other JRP patients. The patients completed activities of daily living, including dressing in community versus hospital attire, with the assistance of an occupational therapist or nurse prior to group exercise sessions. Active-assisted knee ROM was measured in the seated position after the exercise sessions. Family and friends were encouraged to attend PT sessions to participate and learn the home ROM program. Physical therapy included ambulation, and transfer and stair training on an individual basis. Progress toward PT discharge goals (Table 1) was monitored on a dry erase board in the patient's room.

Discharge planning

The JRP was designed to facilitate discharge to home, with outpatient PT for continued rehabilitation. The orthopedist, with input from the multidisciplinary team, determined readiness for discharge based on the following criteria: medical stability (i.e. no anticipated conditions that would require re-admission to the hospital), wound stability (i.e. no erythema, discharge or redness), INR between 1.5 and 2.0, pain controlled with oral medications, and progress towards PT goals. Patients who were unable to be discharged home with outpatient physical therapy because of sub-acute medical needs, unsafe mobility, and/or transportation issues were referred for appropriate post-acute care (e.g. skilled nursing or home health care). Proactive discharge planning by a registered nurse case manager, which was initiated during the pre-operative visit, was continued after surgery. Discharge planning assured the patient had all necessary adaptive equipment and arrangements for follow-up care. Follow-up in the orthopedist's office was planned for 2–3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and yearly after surgery. Follow-up visits with the orthopedist included wound assessment, functional range of motion and radiograph examinations.

Measurements

Measurements were completed during the pre-operative educational session as well as during the inpatient hospital stay. Pre-operatively, height and weight were measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer and digital scale (Taylor Precision Products, Oak Brook IL), and body mass index (BMI) was calculated by weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. During the pre-operative educational session, the 6MWT[27] and the KOOS[28] were administered. The 6MWT test was conducted in an 18 meter uncarpeted hallway, and patients were instructed to cover as much distance as possible within six minutes. Standardized encouragement was given at regular intervals. Patients were permitted to use an assistive device and rest during the testing time. The area was marked in meters and the distance traveled by each patient was measured at the end of six minutes. The reliability of the 6MWT was found to be acceptable in 17 patients scheduled for a total hip or knee arthroplasty (correlation coefficient = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.88 – 0.98).[37] The KOOS is a 42-item self-administered questionnaire that includes five dimensions: pain, disease-related symptoms, activities of daily living function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life measured using a Likert scale (0–4 scale). For the current study, the KOOS was administered without the sport and related function dimension, so the KOOS contained 37 questions. Scores within a dimension or subscale are summed and scaled with zero corresponding to severe knee problems and 100 corresponding to no knee problems. Recently, the reliability and validity of the KOOS was examined in 105 patients with knee osteoarthritis after TKA surgery.[38] The test-retest reliability was adequate with intra-class correlation coefficients at least 0.75 for each of the KOOS subscales. When compared with the SF-36,[39] a widely used measure of general health status, expected and acceptable correlations were reported (e.g., KOOS pain and SF-36 bodily pain correlation coefficient = 0.62). The KOOS also includes dimensions that are not measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), including knee-related quality of life, which had high content validity with TKA candidates. Knee ROM was measured daily during the inpatient stay using a goniometer and standard procedure with the patient in sitting.[40]

The inpatient medical records were abstracted by two of the authors (JW and JC) for age, diagnosis, clinical status, date of admission (surgery), date of discharge, discharge disposition, and medical complications. Additionally, complications over the 6-month follow-up period were abstracted from outpatient medical records by the same two authors.

Analysis

The purpose of this study was descriptive in nature, so analysis consisted of means and standard deviations for interval data, medians and inter-quartile ranges for ordinal data, and percentages for nominal data. Of the 74 patients who received a TKA, pre-operative data were available for 63 patients. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was completed to determine if those who had missing pre-operative data had different characteristics than those who completed the preoperative data collection. SAS Version 9.13 was used for analysis (SAS Institute, Inc. Version 9.13, Cary, NC).

Results

The patients were 71.4 ± 8.7 years old on average, and the majority (62%) was female. 45% were categorized as obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2), 38% were categorized as overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) and 17% were categorized as normal weight (BMI 18–25 kg/m2).

Figure 1 shows the distribution of 6MWT distance in meters for the patients in the cohort who had a pre-operative visit. The distance walked ranged from 110 to 509 meters. To better understand the degree of functional limitation in this cohort of patients relative to the average population, a reference equation was applied to determine the predicted distance walked in six minutes adjusted for age, height, and weight.[41] Using this prediction equation, the patients walked distances on average 68% (± 16%) of age, height, and weight-matched peers.

Figure 1
figure 1

Six minute walk distance (m) for JRP patients who were seen preoperatively (n = 63).

Full size image

The medians and inter-quartile ranges of the four dimensions of the KOOS for the 63 patients who were seen pre-operatively are presented in Table 2. The patients reported the most disability (lowest scores) in the quality of life dimension and the least disability (highest scores) in the disease-related symptoms dimension.

Table 2 Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for JRP patients who were seen pre-operatively (n = 63)
Full size table

The length of the inpatient hospital stay was 2 days for most (53%) of the patients, with 39% and 7% discharged in three and four days, respectively. Three patients (4%) were discharged to a skilled nursing facility. These three patients required more intensive rehabilitation than could be offered in a home or outpatient environment. The remaining patients were discharged home. Of those 71 discharged home, 68% received further rehabilitation in an outpatient setting compared with 32% who received home physical therapy for a period of time before attending outpatient physical therapy.

All patients who were discharged home achieved medical criteria for hospital discharge and met PT goals. For discharge home, PT goals included independence (with assistive device and/or caregiver if necessary) with transfers, ambulation greater than 150 feet, and a home-exercise program. For patients with stairs in their home environment, PT goals also included independence with an assistive device and/or caregiver. 88% of all patients achieved the knee flexion ROM goal of 90° (mean ROM 91.7 ± 5.4 °). 46% of all patients achieved the extension ROM goal of 0° (mean ROM 2.4 ± 2.6°).

Two of the 74 patients (3%) had medical complications during the inpatient hospital stay. One had transient arrhythmia and one had respiratory distress. These 2 patients were treated and the issues resolved prior to discharge from the hospital. During 6 months of post-discharge follow-up, there were 9 patients with complications requiring further care. One patient was readmitted on POD #3 with a diagnosis of dehydration. Intravenous fluids were administered and the patient was discharged without further incident. Three patients required oral antibiotics for the treatment of cellulitis. Two patients fell during this follow-up period. One fall occurred on POD #4 (2 days after discharge), and resulted in back pain that resolved with conservative treatment. The other fall occurred approximately 5 weeks after surgery, and the patient sustained a quadriceps tendon rupture. After surgical intervention and rehabilitation, a satisfactory outcome was reported. Three patients required knee-joint manipulations and additional physical therapy approximately 6–7 weeks post-surgery in order to increase flexion ROM.

A sensitivity analysis was completed comparing the 63 patients with pre-operative data with those who did not have pre-operative data collected. The results showed no statistical differences (p > 0.05 for all) for age, sex, hospital length of stay, or discharge disposition (data not shown).

Discussion

The purpose of this descriptive study was to describe a wellness-based, comprehensive program (the JRP) for patients undergoing TKA and to report post-surgical outcomes of 74 consecutive inpatients. The program was developed based on current evidence and expert opinion and was designed to minimize lengths of stay and post-operative complications. The JRP consisted of pre-operative education, peri- and post-operative pain management, clinical pathways, and aggressive physical therapy. The majority of the patients in the JRP met the PT mobility goals (Table 1) to allow a safe discharge home. The JRP also resulted in short lengths of stay with few post-operative complications relative to published literature.[42]

The literature relating to pre-operative education prior to TKA is equivocal. A 2003 NIH Consensus Statement stated that pre-operative education is related to favorable outcomes.[12] Similarly, Coudeyre et al. concluded that a pre-operative program involving multidisciplinary education, exercise training, and discharge planning contributed to reduced hospital lengths of stay and improved functional status.[13] However, a Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials found little evidence to support the use of pre-operative education to improve pain, functioning, and length of hospital stay.[14] This review concluded that anxiety was the only variable that was consistently and positively impacted by pre-operative education.[14] The purpose of pre-operative education in our program was to lessen patients' anxiety by making them aware of post-operative rehabilitation and involving them in goal setting and discharge planning.

The current study administered a medication regimen designed to minimize post-operative pain, opiod use, and inflammation to encourage early and aggressive mobility. The pre-operative medication regimen included a long-acting analgesia and medication to reduce inflammation, anxiety, and nausea and vomiting. Intra-operative analgesia included a short acting spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia has been shown to result in less intra-operative blood loss, lower incidence of DVT, and better post-operative pain management compared with general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip surgery.[32] The results from the current study showed no incidence of DVT and short lengths of stay with discharge home, suggesting that pain was not a limiting factor in rehabilitation.

Prior to the surgical closing of the TKA, an injection of analgesics and anti-inflammatory medication was administered into the intra-articular space. This injection has been shown to improve pain control after joint arthroplasty. [15–17] In a trial of 64 patients admitted for TKA, 32 patients were randomized to receive a multimodal intra-operative injection and 32 patients comprised the control group.[15] Compared with the control group, those patients who received the injection used significantly less PCA in the immediate post-operative period (p < 0.01 at 6 hours, p = 0.016 at 12 hours, and p < 0.001 at 24 hours). The patients who received the injection also had higher patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.013) and lower scores for pain (p = 0.007) 4 hours after surgery compared with the control group. There were no significant between-group differences in the average length of hospital stay or incidence of complications. Although pain in the immediate post-operative period was not formally measured in the current study, the JRP protocol including the initiation of post-operative rehabilitation within 2–4 hours of surgery supports the hypothesis that the intra-articular injection provided good pain relief.

There is consistent support in the literature for early and aggressive physical therapy, or mobilization, following TKA.[10, 21–24] A study of 50 patients reported a shorter length of stay for the experimental group who received early rehabilitation compared to the control group (3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 6.6 ± 2.6 days).[21] Interestingly, the working definitions of "early" and "aggressive" have changed over the years. Articles written several years ago defined early rehabilitation in "units" of days [10, 22] and activity was often focused on chair sitting.[22] In contrast, recent work refers to early rehabilitation in terms of hours and activity in terms of active lower extremity exercise and ambulation.[21] Consistent with more recent literature,[10, 21–25] the goal of our JRP program was to have patients ambulate 2–4 hours post-surgically. Although we cannot say definitively, we hypothesize that this early rehabilitation contributed to the attainment of JRP goals (Table 1) and lengths of stay that were short compared with published literature.[42]

Based on the reported results, the JRP program was considered successful. 71 out of the 74 patients were discharged home and were functionally independent or were safe with minimal assistance from a caregiver. At the time of discharge, knee ROM averaged 2.4° (± 2.6°) to 91.7° (± 5.4°). The average length of stay for patients in the JRP was 2.5 days. The authors see this result as optimal based on comparison with a recent study using the U.S. National Hospital Discharge Survey that reported an average length of stay for primary TKA of 5.3 days.[42] While a longer stay could result in higher costs to the hospital that are not likely to be reimbursed, a shorter stay may be associated with the failure to detect developing complications such as wound infection or cardiovascular conditions.[43] Despite the short lengths of stay, in-hospital complications occurred in fewer than 3% of the patients, which is lower than published data.[42] Post-discharge complications were reported in 12% of the patients during 6 months of follow-up.

The primary strength of this paper was that it included a clinical population of consecutive inpatients admitted for TKA to a regional medical center. All measurements and interventions were carried out by practicing clinicians as part of standard clinical care. Additionally, the characteristics of the patients reflect the demographics of TKA candidates.[3, 42] The patients in the current study reported slightly higher pre-operative KOOS scores for each subscale compared with 105 TKA candidates,[38] but reported similar scores when compared with 47 people with severe osteoarthritis.[44] This study has some limitations. The design of this study was descriptive and therefore had no control group. This study compared results to published literature. It is important to understand and report characteristics of patients and thoroughly describe clinical programs as the basis for future clinical reference and/or research. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes of a comprehensive JRP; therefore this study was unable to evaluate isolated components of the program.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have shown that a comprehensive TKA program, consisting of pre-operative education, peri-operative pain management, and early and aggressive PT was associated with short lengths of stay, discharge home with outpatient physical therapy follow-up, and minimal inpatient and 6-month follow-up complications. This JRP may represent an efficient, effective and safe protocol for providing care after a TKA.

References

  1. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, Cross WW, MacDonald RM, Rutks I: Total knee replacement. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2003, 1-8. 86

  2. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS: Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. Jama. 1994, 271 (17): 1349-1357. 10.1001/jama.271.17.1349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B: The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87 (8): 1719-1724. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O: Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007, 3: 144-151. 10.2106/JBJS.G.00587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lavernia C, Lee DJ, Hernandez VH: The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 446: 221-226. 10.1097/01.blo.0000214424.67453.9a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ong KL, Mowat FS, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern MT, Kurtz SM: Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrolees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 446: 22-28. 10.1097/01.blo.0000214439.95268.59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Tomek I, Tosteson A: Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88 (11): 2348-2355. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CMS Updates Hospital Payment Information for Value-Driven Health Care. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2007

  9. Healy WL, Iorio R, Ko J, Appleby D, Lemos DW: Impact of cost reduction programs on short-term patient outcome and hospital cost of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002, 84-A (3): 348-353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE: Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Jama. 1998, 279 (11): 847-852. 10.1001/jama.279.11.847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teeny SM, York SC, Benson C, Perdue ST: Does shortened length of hospital stay affect total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation outcomes?. J Arthroplasty. 2005, 20 (7 Suppl 3): 39-45. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003, 20 (1): 1-34.

  13. Coudeyre E, Jardin C, Givron P, Ribinik P, Revel M, Rannou F: Could preoperative rehabilitation modify postoperative outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007, 50 (3): 189-197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald S, Hetrick S, Green S: Pre-operative education for hip or knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, CD003526-1

  15. Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW: Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88 (5): 959-963. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parvataneni HK, Shah VP, Howard H, Cole N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS: Controlling pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty using a multimodal protocol with local periarticular injections: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2007, 22 (6 Suppl 2): 33-38. 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vendittoli PA, Makinen P, Drolet P, Lavigne M, Fallaha M, Guertin MC, Varin F: A multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88 (2): 282-289. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunenberg DE, van Steyn MJ, Sluimer JC, Bekebrede LL, Bulstra SK, Joore MA: Joint recovery programme versus usual care: an economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery. Med Care. 2005, 43 (10): 1018-1026. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178266.75744.35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho DM, Huo MH: Are critical pathways and implant standardization programs effective in reducing costs in total knee replacement operations?. J Am Coll Surg. 2007, 205 (1): 97-100. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walter FL, Bass N, Bock G, Markel DC: Success of clinical pathways for total joint arthroplasty in a community hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007, 457: 133-137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Issac D, Falode T, Liu P, I'Anson H, Dillow K, Gill P: Accelerated rehabilitation after total knee replacement. Knee. 2005, 12 (5): 346-350. 10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peerbhoy D, Keane P, Maciver K, Shenkin A, Hall GM, Salmon P: The systematic assessment of short-term functional recovery after major joint arthroplasty. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999, 19 (3): 165-171. 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00325.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS: Pain management and accelerated rehabilitation for total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007, 22 (7 Suppl 3): 12-15. 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Mehta A: Total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation protocol: what makes the difference?. J Arthroplasty. 2003, 18 (3 Suppl 1): 27-30. 10.1054/arth.2003.50080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters CL, Shirley B, Erickson J: The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006, 21 (6 Suppl 2): 132-138. 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Colwell CW: Thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Am J Orthop. 2006, 1-9. quiz 10–11, Suppl

  27. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW, Berman LB: The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985, 132 (8): 919-923.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998, 28 (2): 88-96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM: Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006, 59 (2): 160-167. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Illgen RL, Pellino TA, Gordon DB, Butts S, Heiner JP: Prospective analysis of a novel long-acting oral opioid analgesic regimen for pain control after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006, 21 (6): 814-820. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H: A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  32. Indelli PF, Grant SA, Nielsen K, Vail TP: Regional anesthesia in hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005, 441: 250-255. 10.1097/01.blo.0000192355.71966.8e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sextro GS, Berry DJ, Rand JA: Total knee arthroplasty using cruciate-retaining kinematic condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001, 33-40. 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00007. 388

  34. Whiteside LA: Choosing your implant: cementless, patella sparing, and posterior cruciate ligament retaining. J Arthroplasty. 2005, 20 (4 Suppl 2): 10-11. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Colwell CW: The use of the pain pump and patient-controlled analgesia in joint reconstruction. Am J Orthop. 2004, 33 (5 Suppl): 10-12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bourne MH: Analgesics for orthopedic postoperative pain. Am J Orthop. 2004, 33 (3): 128-135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Hanna SE, Wessel J, Gollish JD: Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 7: 100-10.1186/1471-2474-7-100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003, 1: 17-10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30 (6): 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Norkin CC, White DJ: Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 2003, Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 3

    Google Scholar 

  41. Enright PL, Sherrill DL: Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 158 (5 Pt 1): 1384-1387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Memtsoudis SG, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Besculides MC, Gaber L, Sculco TP: In-hospital Complications and Mortality of Unilateral, Bilateral, and Revision TKA: Based on an estimate of 4,159,661 Discharges. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008, 466 (11): 2617-2627. 10.1007/s11999-008-0402-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Parvizi J, Mui A, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH: Total joint arthroplasty: When do fatal or near-fatal complications occur?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007, 89 (1): 27-32. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB: The Dutch version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008, 6: 16-10.1186/1477-7525-6-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thomas McPoil is gratefully acknowledged for providing initial consultation and guidance in the design of the study. Kathryn Jessop and the nursing staff of the Sedona Unit, Steve Romfo, Lisa Zublionis, Dave Castillo, Guy Jaaskaleinen, Randy Boardman, and the other physical therapy staff of the Department of Rehabilitation Services from Verde Valley Medical Center are gratefully acknowledged for providing patient care. Laura Andre and Thea McDonough from Verde Valley Orthopedics provided vital patient coordination.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Verde Valley Medical Center, 269 S. Candy Lane, Cottonwood, AZ, USA

      Jon R Cook & Paul Prefontaine

    2. Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15105, Flagstaff, AZ, USA

      Meghan Warren & Kathleen J Ganley

    3. Verde Valley Orthopedics, 450 S. Willard Street, Suite 101, Cottonwood, AZ, USA

      Jack W Wylie

    Authors
    1. Jon R Cook
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Meghan Warren
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Kathleen J Ganley
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Paul Prefontaine
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Jack W Wylie
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Meghan Warren.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    JC conceived of the study, participated in data collection, provided patient care, and helped to draft the manuscript. MW performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. KG participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. PP participated in the design of the study, and participated in data collection. JW helped with the design of the study, provided patient care, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Jon R Cook and Jack W Wylie contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Cook, J.R., Warren, M., Ganley, K.J. et al. A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9, 154 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-154

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-154

    Keywords

    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

    ISSN: 1471-2474

    Contact us