Validation of the GALS musculoskeletal screening exam for use in primary care: a pilot study
© Beattie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 22 April 2008
Accepted: 27 August 2008
Published: 27 August 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Apr 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Max Field|
|14 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clive Kelly|
|30 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Foster|
|30 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Beattie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Max Field|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Aug 2008||Editorially accepted|
|27 Aug 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-9-115|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.