First histological observations on the incorporation of a novel nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste OSTIM® in human cancellous bone
© Huber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 18 December 2005
Accepted: 08 June 2006
Published: 08 June 2006
A commercially available nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste Ostim® has been reported in few recent studies to surpass other synthetic bone substitutes with respect to the observed clinical results. However, the integration of this implantable material has been histologically evaluated only in animal experimental models up to now. This study aimed to evaluate the tissue incorporation of Ostim® in human cancellous bone after reconstructive bone surgery for trauma.
Biopsy specimens from 6 adult patients with a total of 7 tibial, calcaneal or distal radial fractures were obtained at the time of osteosynthesis removal. The median interval from initial operation to tissue sampling was 13 (range 3–15) months. Samples were stained with Masson-Goldner, von Kossa, and toluidine blue. Osteoid volume, trabecular width and bone volume, and cortical porosity were analyzed. Samples were immunolabeled with antibodies against CD68, CD56 and human prolyl 4-hydroxylase to detect macrophages, osteoblasts, and fibroblasts, respectively. TRAP stainings were used to identify osteoclasts.
Histomorphometric data indicated good regeneration with normal bone turnover: mean osteoid volume was 1.93% of the trabecular bone mass, trabecular bone volume – 28.4%, trabecular width – 225.12 μm, and porosity index – 2.6%. Cortical and spongious bone tissue were well structured. Neither inflammatory reaction, nor osteofibrosis or osteonecrosis were observed. The implanted material was widely absorbed.
The studied nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste showed good tissue incorporation. It is highly biocompatible and appears to be a suitable bone substitute for juxtaarticular comminuted fractures in combination with a stable screw-plate osteosynthesis.
Operative reconstruction of bone defects beyond a certain size is mandatory and still remains a challenge to trauma and orthopedic surgeons. Every year, millions of people are suffering from bone defects arising from trauma, tumor or bone diseases . In about 10% of all reconstructive operations because of traumatic, resectional, or congenital defects, bone transplants and bone substitute materials are necessary .
Autologous cancellous bone remains the "gold standard" in the reconstruction of bone defects because of its unsurpassed biological activity even in implant sites with low osteogenic potential. The main disadvantages of human autografts are their limited quantity and the morbidity associated with their harvest [3, 4]. Human allografts offer an abundantly available alternative, which circumvents the potential morbidity of autograft harvest, but relies on a sophisticated bone banking system and carries the potential of disease transmission and immunogenicity. Furthermore, the structural, mechanical, and resorption properties of allografts are usually much altered by processing, preservation, and sterilization techniques . The relative concerns over the use of either autograft or allograft have led to the development of numerous entirely synthetic bone graft substitutes.
Mineral bone substitutes have been in widespread clinical use for a number of years. The most commonly used mineral substitutes for bone defect and trauma applications as implant coatings and defect fillers are thermally processed hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate. Due to their osteoconductive potential and the absence of antigenicity, osteointegration usually occurs quickly and reliably in sterile and well vascularized sites . Hydroxyapatite has a similar crystal structure to that of bone mineral and has been investigated as a bone replacement material for over 30 years [7, 8].
The current study presents the first histological observations on the incorporation of this nanocrystalline HA paste in human cancellous bone in a group of patients, treated for various types of bone fractures.
Characteristics of patients from whom bone biopsies were obtained.
Location of fracture
Interval to biopsy (mo)
Distal radius right
Distal radius left
Reconstruction of distal radial defects
Reconstruction of calcaneal defects
An extended lateral approach with an L-shaped incision was performed, beginning proximally, over the lateral aspect of the heel. It was then continued distally between the lateral malleolus and the posterior and inferior border of the heel. The peroneal tendons were then mobilized within their sheath and held back. After exposing the lateral calcaneal surface, which allowed the identification of the fracture lines, anatomic reduction was performed. In most cases we began with the reduction of the tuberosity fragment with the aid of a Schanz screw inserted dorsally. Further anatomical reduction was also conducted using various reduction aids, e.g. provisional K-wires. Special attention was paid to the exact reconstruction of the posterior facet. After realigning the impacted area, defect zones of various volumes normally remained behind. At that time-point the need of HA defect filling was definitively determined. The defect was then filled with a median volume of 5 ml Ostim® after partial fixation of the bone using a calcaneal plate (Calcaneus Conventional® 100% titanium plate – Litos Company, Hamburg, Germany). The osteoreconstructive result was examined intraoperatively by diaphanoscopy.
Reconstruction of tibial head defects
A decision about the type of surgical access to be used (lateral, medial, posterolateral or biportal) was based upon the fracture morphology. The deep incision went straight down to the bone leaving a narrow border of fascia attached to the tibia. The impacted articular surface had to be elevated. In order to secure the achieved reposition K-wires were temporary inserted. The cavity walls were coated with the absorbable hydroxyapatite paste (Ostim®) before a hydroxyapatite ceramic core (Cerabone®) was inserted. Once the ceramic was inserted, it was then covered with more hydroxyapatite paste before closing the cortical window. The bone voids were filled with 5 ml to 10 ml Ostim® (median volume – 9 ml). Repositioning results were preserved by the implantation of an angular stable titanium screw-plate system (Synthes/Oberndorf-Switzerland).
In summary, the morphological features of the bone tissue showed good regeneration of the bone with normal bone turnover. There was neither inflammatory reaction, nor osteonecrosis. The implanted material was widely resorbed.
Limited availability and donor site morbidity represent major disadvantages of autografts. As many as 39% of patients may complain of chronic pain at the donor site after iliac crest harvest . Furthermore, there is an added operative time and blood loss inherent in obtaining it. Other complications include arterial and nerve injury, infection, cosmetic deformity, gait disturbance, fracture, hernia, and sacroiliac joint injury . Allografts are known to be immunogenic and virus transmission remains a major cause of concern. For some of these problems, synthetic HA bone substitutes have been considered a reasonable alternative. They are known to be biocompatible, osteoconductive, non-toxic, non-inflammatory, and non-immunogenic agents [14, 15]. Due to their comparatively low mechanical stability, however, they should be used primarily for the reconstruction of metaphyseal bone deficiencies and less for major diaphyseal defects. Typical clinical indications, therefore, would be juxtaarticular fractures, for example, in the distal radius, proximal humerus, proximal and distal tibia, or calcaneus. They also represent an interesting alternative for reconstructing defects in the same locations resulting from the resection of benign bone tumors. The major problem with sintered HA bone substitutes (ceramics) seems to be their failure to undergo sufficient physiological remodelling. This shortcoming is attributable mainly to the heating of mineral beyond 1000°C during the sintering process. This results in the transformation of the tiny (<60 nm) primary HA crystallites into significantly larger crystals, which are difficult to break down for osteoclasts. This leads to a relatively poor bioresorbability and limiting handling characteristics . While the handling characteristics were improved by the introduction of malleable HA cements, bioresorbability has remained a problem. A great variety of calcium phosphate-based injectable bone substitutes are now commercially available: Bone Source® (Howmedica, USA), Norian SRS® (Norian, USA), Cementek® (Teknimed SA, France), Mimics® (Biomet, USA), Biocement D® (Biomet Merck Ltd, Germany), Biobon® (Biomet Merck Ltd, Germany; in USA distributed as α-BSM™, ETEX, USA), True bone® (ETEX, USA) etc. Up to now there has been accumulating evidence that osteoclasts are able to resorb these substances, though not with the same speed for the different representatives [17, 18]. It will be interesting to directly compare in future studies the resorption of Ostim® and the mentioned bone substitutes, and to investigate probable advantages of the combined use of Ostim® with biphasic TCP/HA granules or other newly developed materials .
To overcome the mentioned disadvantage of ceramics and cements, a new technology was used for the production of Ostim®. It is synthesized by a wet chemical reaction of precipitation under permanent pH control using CaO dispersed in water under constant stirring to maintain a suspension state and H3PO4 as starting material. The amounts of both starting materials and water lead to suspension containing 5.5% of nanosized HA crystals. This suspension with a pH of 7.5 is concentrated using filtration and subsequent evaporation process leading to a high viscous paste with an HA content of 35% and a specific surface area of 106 m2/g . It does not harden off when mixed with blood or spongiosa and its volume stability enables it to resist bleeding pressure. Simultaneously, its viscosity enables it to be applied to form-fit in close contact with the bone .
The above mentioned putative functional advantages of Ostim® were proved in humans by two large clinical studies in the sphere of human dentofacial surgery. In the first study, Zuev et al. in 1996 found Ostim® to be not inferior to bone transplant and devoid of its shortcomings in the treatment of 395 patients with periodontal defects, including mainly periodontal abscesses. Control physical examinations were performed 3, 7, and 21 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation. Control X-rays were performed 6 months after surgery. Complications in the group of 200 patients treated with Ostim® were only 1.5% and never involved the site of osteoplasty, whereas the complication rate was 3.6% in the group of 195 patients treated with chemically processed bone xenotransplants . In the second study, Bezrukov et al. reported excellent clinical results with the use of Ostim® in 49 patients who underwent cystectomy for benign cyst-tumors of the jaws. One month after the operation defects were already beginning to lose their borders, three months after the reconstruction a full bone regeneration was radiologically observed at the place of paste application, and 6 months after the manipulation mature bone tissue with a normal configuration and optical density was confirmed at X-ray films in all cases. No procedure-related complications were reported .
Apart from the above two trials, no other reports on the applicability of Ostim® in human medicine are currently to be found in world literature. Experiments with the paste were performed in several animal studies, some of them including histological observations. It was well tolerated in dogs, sheep, rabbits and pigs. The first one of these studies, which investigated the histological integration of Ostim® in the dental wall of four dogs, was reported by Grigor'ian et al. in 2000, who revealed excellent osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties of Ostim® . Thorwarth et al. reported 44.2–53.9% mineralized bone substance in pigs after 3–6 months in the region of the reconstructed defect and 0% remnants of the bone substitute 6 months after its application . As the paste does not harden in situ, cell migration into the implantation area coincided with revascularization. Fragmentation of the paste was observed in all animal models immediately after implantation. That fragmentation into round particles of different size must be regarded as an essential step toward successful reconstitution of tissue integrity. It enables cellular infiltration of the implantation site and enables osteoblasts to perform bone formation in an osteoconductive manner. After implantation of the nanocrystalline HA paste into tibial head defects of sheep, the voids were completely filled with new bone even after 60 days. Due to proceeding bone healing, ramifications of trabecular bone could be seen between the implant particles. This spatial ingrowth pattern, taken together with the stimulation of osteoblast activity, supports complete reconstitution (e.g. bridging) of critical-size defects of animals within 4 weeks .
Although our study reports on a series of biopsy specimens taken at different time intervals from human patients with various types of fractures rather than from laboratory animals with standardized defects, the basic pattern of integration of the nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite appears to be the same in animals and humans: there is no fibrous interface, but instead an intimate contact between new bone and substitute material is established. At an early stage, a disintegration of the substitute material occurs and new bone starts to form trabeculae and osteonal structures like in conventional fracture healing.
Our findings, arising from the treatment of comminuted juxtaarticular fractures confirmed the good clinical results from the application of the nanocrystalline HA paste in dentofacial surgery. Moreover, the first histological observations on the integration of Ostim® made in our small group of patients perfectly agree with the previous histological findings in experimental animal models.
The nanocrystalline HA paste is easy to prepare and easy to apply by syringe in the operating room. A second surgical procedure to harvest autologous bone is not necessary, and complications at the donor site are therefore avoided. There is no risk of transmitting any disease. This safe and osteoconductive HA paste appears suitable for filling bone defects and bone cavities, showing resorption and a rapid osseous integration. Clinical results were comparable to those obtained in patients treated with autograft implants, and histology revealed that fracture healing went undisturbed and active resorption was performed by osteoclasts. This material appears to be mechanically and biologically efficient and safe. It is able to preserve well its volume, but not its form, so for the purposes of fracture reconstructions it should be always used in combination with a stable screw-plate osteosynthesis.
- Murugan R, Ramakrishna S: Bioresorbable composite bone paste using polysaccharide based nano hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials. 2004, 25: 3829-3835. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schnettler R, Stahl JP, Alt V, Pavlidis T, Dingeldein E, Wenisch S: Calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Eur J Trauma. 2004, 30: 219-229. 10.1007/s00068-004-1393-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA: Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthoped. 1996, 329: 300-309. 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Younger EM, Chapman MW: Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma. 1989, 3: 192-195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough J: Allograft bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999, 30: 571-581. 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70110-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bucholz RW: Clinical experience with bone graft substitutes. J Orthop Trauma. 1987, 1: 260-262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hing KA, Best SM, Tanner KE, Bonfield W: Biomechanical assessment of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997, 8: 731-736. 10.1023/A:1018500309969.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Constanz BR, Ison IC, Fulmer MT, Poser R, Smith ST, van Wagoner M, Ross J, Goldstein SA, Jupiter JB, Rosenthal DI: Skeletal rapair by in situ formation of the mineral phase of bone. Science. 1995, 267: 1796-1799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rauschmann MA, Wichelhaus TA, Stirnal V, Dingeldein E, Zichner L, Schnettler R, Alt V: Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate as biodegradable composite carrier material for local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. Biomaterials. 2005, 26: 2677-2684. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuev VP, Dmitrieva LA, Pankratov AS, Filatova NA: [The comparative characteristics of stimulators of reparative osteogenesis in the treatment of periodontal diseases] [Article in Russian]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1996, 75 (5): 31-34.Google Scholar
- Bezrukov VM, Grigor'iants LA, Zuev VP, Pankratov AS: [The surgical treatment of jaw cysts using hydroxyapatite with an ultrahigh degree of dispersity] [Article in Russian]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1998, 77 (1): 31-35.Google Scholar
- Donath K, Breuner G: A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue. J Oral Pathol. 1982, 11: 318-326. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nissi R, Autio-Harmainen H, Marttila P, Sormunen R, Kivirikko KI: Prolyl 4-hydroxylase isoenzymes I and II have different expression patterns in several human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 2001, 49 (9): 1143-1153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarcho M: Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prostetics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981, 157: 259-278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hench LL: Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991, 74: 1487-1510. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Landuyt P, Li F, Keustermans JP, Streydio JM, Delannay F, Munting E: The influence of high sintering temperatures on the mechanical properties of hydroxylapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1995, 6: 8-13. 10.1007/BF00121239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Basle MF, Chappard D, Grizon F, Filmon R, Delecrin J, Daculsi G, Rebel A: Osteoclastic resorption of Ca-P biomaterials implanted in rabbit bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993, 53: 348-356. 10.1007/BF01351842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamada S, Heymann D, Bouler JM, Dagulsi G: Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate ratios. Biomaterials. 1997, 18: 1037-1041. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00036-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chris Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW, Buma P: The use of a bioresorbable nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite paste in acetabular bone impaction grafting. Biomaterials. 2006, 27: 1110-1118. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- AAP Implantate AG 2005: Ostim® – Product information. [http://www.aap.de/en/Produkte/Orthobiologie/Knochenersatz/Ostim/index_html]
- Grigor'ian AS, Grigor'iants LA, Podoinikova MN: [A comparative analysis of the efficacy of different types of filling materials in the surgical elimination of tooth perforations (experimental morphological research)][Article in Russian]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2000, 79 (4): 9-12.Google Scholar
- Thorwarth WM, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA: Bone regeneration in osseous defects using a resorbable nanoparticular hydroxyapatite. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 63 (11): 1626-1633. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/50/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.