Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty
© Kennedy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 28 June 2004
Accepted: 28 January 2005
Published: 28 January 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jun 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agustin Escalante|
|15 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Deborah Kennedy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jan 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Deborah Kennedy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Jan 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jan 2005||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jan 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-6-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.