Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Randomized clinical trial of surgery versus conservative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome [ISRCTN84286481]

  • Brook I Martin1,
  • Linda M Levenson1,
  • William Hollingworth3,
  • Michel Kliot4,
  • Patrick J Heagerty5,
  • Judith A Turner2 and
  • Jeffrey G Jarvik3Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders20056:2

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-2

Received: 09 November 2004

Accepted: 18 January 2005

Published: 18 January 2005

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
9 Nov 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Brook Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jan 2005 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-6-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center
Department Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
Department of Radiology, University of Washington
Department Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington