Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
© Hermann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 31 July 2013
Accepted: 11 February 2014
Published: 19 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maciej Buchowski|
|12 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johannes Bussmann|
|3 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Andreas Hermann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maciej Buchowski|
|7 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johannes Bussmann|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-15-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.