Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© Laird et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 13 May 2014
Accepted: 1 July 2014
Published: 10 July 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 May 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Hancock|
|2 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tasha Stanton|
|18 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Laird|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-15-229|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.