Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Robert A Laird1, 5Email author,
  • Jayce Gilbert2,
  • Peter Kent3, 4 and
  • Jennifer L Keating1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201415:229

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229

Received: 13 May 2014

Accepted: 1 July 2014

Published: 10 July 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Hancock
2 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tasha Stanton
18 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Robert Laird
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
10 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University
(2)
Peak MSK Physiotherapy
(3)
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark
(4)
Research Department, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern Denmark
(5)

Advertisement