A randomized pilot study of a comprehensive postoperative exercise program compared with usual care following primary total hip arthroplasty in subjects less than 65 years of age: feasibility, selection of outcome measures and timing of assessment
© Beaupre et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 22 January 2014
Accepted: 14 May 2014
Published: 2 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Beaupre|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justine Naylor|
|17 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vigdis Schnell Husby|
|10 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Beaupre|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-15-192|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.