Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A randomized pilot study of a comprehensive postoperative exercise program compared with usual care following primary total hip arthroplasty in subjects less than 65 years of age: feasibility, selection of outcome measures and timing of assessment

  • Lauren A Beaupre1, 2Email author,
  • Edward CO Masson2,
  • Barbara J Luckhurst3,
  • Orfan Arafah2 and
  • Gregory J O’Connor2
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201415:192

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-192

Received: 22 January 2014

Accepted: 14 May 2014

Published: 2 June 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
22 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lauren Beaupre
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justine Naylor
17 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vigdis Schnell Husby
10 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lauren Beaupre
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 May 2014 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-15-192

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physical Therapy, 2-50 Corbett Hall, University of Alberta
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta
Department of Rehabilitation, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Alberta Health Services