Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A comparative study on the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints among musicians and non-musicians

  • Laura M Kok1Email author,
  • Theodora PM Vliet Vlieland1,
  • Marta Fiocco1 and
  • Rob GHH Nelissen1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:9

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-9

Received: 1 July 2012

Accepted: 18 December 2012

Published: 4 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Debora Alperovich
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bionka Huisstede
5 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Laura Kok
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
4 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Orthopedics J11-R, Leiden University Medical Center