Protocol for determining the diagnostic validity of physical examination maneuvers for shoulder pathology
© Somerville et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 May 2011
Accepted: 15 January 2013
Published: 8 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerard Malanga|
|5 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Lyndsay Somerville|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Borden Hopkins|
|22 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lyndsay Somerville|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Borden Hopkins|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.