Influence of the gel thickness on in vivo hyaline cartilage regeneration induced by double-network gel implanted at the bottom of a large osteochondral defect: Short-term results
© Matsuda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 June 2012
Accepted: 29 January 2013
Published: 31 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chun-Yuh Huang|
|22 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Casper Foldager|
|1 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Koichi Masuda|
|28 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nobuto Kitamura|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chun-Yuh Huang|
|22 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Koichi Masuda|
|6 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nobuto Kitamura|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Koichi Masuda|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-50|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.