Lower circulating preptin levels in male patients with osteoporosis are correlated with bone mineral density and bone formation

  • Ning Li1,

    Affiliated with

    • Yi-Bo Zheng2,

      Affiliated with

      • Jie Han1Email author,

        Affiliated with

        • Wei Liang3,

          Affiliated with

          • Jia-Yi Wang1,

            Affiliated with

            • Jie-Ru Zhou1,

              Affiliated with

              • Yi Shen1 and

                Affiliated with

                • Jie Zhang1

                  Affiliated with

                  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:49

                  DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-49

                  Received: 14 August 2012

                  Accepted: 26 January 2013

                  Published: 31 January 2013

                  Abstract

                  Background

                  Serum preptin levels among subjects with different bone mineral densities (BMD) were measured and investigated to determine the correlation between BMD and bone-metabolic markers.

                  Methods

                  Approximately 52 elderly male patients with osteoporosis, 50 elderly men with osteopaenia, and 31 age-matched normal bone mass controls participated in the study. The serum preptin levels and bone metabolic markers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The relationships between preptin levels, BMD, and metabolic parameters were also assessed.

                  Results

                  The serum preptin level was the lowest in the osteoporosis group and positively correlated with BMD. All the bone formation markers in the osteoporosis and osteopaenia groups were significantly reduced compared with those in the normal group. Serum preptin level was positively correlated with all the bone formation markers, whereas no correlation was observed with the bone resorption marker TRACP-5b.

                  Conclusions

                  Serum preptin levels are decreased in osteoporosis and osteopaenia patients and positively correlated with BMD. Therefore, preptin is involved in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, probably through bone formation rather than bone resorption.

                  Keywords

                  Preptin Osteoporosis Bone density Bone metabolic marker

                  Background

                  Bone remodelling is essential for adult bone homoeostasis. The failure of this process often leads to the development of osteoporosis, a current major global health concern [1]. The most important factor that affects normal bone remodelling is the tightly controlled and orchestrated regulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Any disturbance in this balance causes various bone diseases, including osteoporosis, which is characteristically defined as decreases bone density with high risk of fracture [2, 3]. Anti-resorption agents are considered in the rebuilding of the bone remodelling balance because postmenopausal osteoporosis (type I) is characterised by bone resorption that exceeds bone formation. By contrast, the characterisation of senile osteoporosis (type II) is reduced bone formation, whereas bone resorption is nearly stable. Thus, stimulating bone formation is another way of treating osteoporosis [4].

                  Recent advances and increased knowledge in the regulation of osteoblastic bone development and bone mass maintenance have enhanced the current understanding on why variations in normal osteoblastogenesis regulation induces bone diseases [5, 6]. Further studies on the regulatory factors promote the discovery of therapeutic targets for stimulating bone formation, and when combined with other therapies, provide the ultimate treatment for osteoporosis [710]. Preptin, cosecreted with insulin and amylin from β-cells [11, 12], is a 34–amino acid peptide that corresponds to Asp69–Leu102 of the proinsulin-like growth factor IIE-peptide (pro-IGF-IIE) [12, 13]. Preptin is a physiologic amplifier of glucose-mediated insulin secretion. Elevated plasma preptin levels in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) suggest that preptin participates in the pathogenesis of T2DM [14]. Preptin stimulates osteoblast proliferation and reduces osteoblast apoptosis. Preptin administration increases bone area and mineralising surface in adult mice [15]. Therefore, preptin is involved in bone anabolism and contributes to the bone mass preservation observed in hyperinsulinaemic states, such as obesity [15]. These initial results obtained in animals and human diabetes patients led us to investigate circulating preptin levels in human osteoporosis. In the present study, serum preptin levels were measured in male subjects with different bone mineral density (BMD), in order to exclude the influence of type I osteoporosis. We also assessed the association between serum preptin levels, BMD, and several metabolic parameters in these subjects.

                  Methods

                  Subjects

                  133 elderly men participated in the study. All study subjects were of Han Chinese origin and lived in the same region of the country. The subjects had no history of T2DM, no clinical evidence of any major diseases, and they were selected from the participants who had undergone routine medical check-ups from Jun 2011 to Aug 2011. None of the subjects was taking any medication that affects bone metabolism. Candidates with body mass indices (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 or BMI > 25 kg/m2 were all excluded. Age and BMI matched control subjects were selected. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Shanghai East Hospital affiliated of Tong Ji University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

                  Bone mineral density (BMD)

                  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, GE Lunar Prodigy, US) was used to determine the BMD in the anteroposterior L2–4 lumbar spine, left femoral neck, and left total hip of the subjects. All cases were then divided into a normal bone mass group (n = 31), an osteopaenia group (n = 50), and an osteoporosis group (n = 52) according to BMD (anyone of L2-4, left femoral neck, or left total hip).

                  The World Health Organization (WHO) defines osteoporosis based on the BMD measurement [16]. Osteopaenia is defined as a BMD between 1 standard deviation (SD) and 2.5 SDs below the mean for young adults (i.e., the T score), whereas osteoporosis is defined as a BMD of >2.5 SDs below the mean for young adults [12]. This definition was developed for Caucasian postmenopausal women but it appears to be valid in men as well [17].

                  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

                  The serum concentration of preptin was determined by ELISA (R&D, USA). The linear range of the assay was 0.3 ng/mL to 10 ng/mL. Bone formation markers [serum bone alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP), bone Gla protein (BGP), procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (PINP)], and bone resorption item tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b) were determined by ELISA according to manufacturers’ instructions.

                  Statistical analysis

                  The data are shown as mean ± SD. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The baseline characteristics of the test and the control subjects were compared by one-way ANOVA, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or chi-square test. The general linear modelling function analysis was used to control potential confounders. As our primary approach, the serum preptin concentrations were included as continuous independent variables in the multivariate models. Simple and multiple regression analyses were used to examine the association between serum preptin concentrations and the other biomarkers. All of the statistical analyses were two-sided, and a P < 0.05 was considered significant.

                  Results

                  General data

                  The clinical characteristics of the subjects are shown in (Table  1). No significant difference was observed between the age, body height, weight, and BMI in all three groups (p > 0.05). Thus, the ages, body height, weight, and BMI were all matched.
                  Table 1

                  Clinical characteristics of study subjects (Data are mean±SD)

                  Groups

                  Cases (n)

                  Age (y)

                  Height (m)

                  Weight (kg)

                  BMI (kg/m2)

                  Osteoporosis

                  52

                  78.07 ± 4.61

                  1.64 ± 0.06

                  59.86 ± 6.17

                  22.34 ± 1.84

                  Osteopenia

                  50

                  77.94 ± 4.51

                  1.64 ± 0.06

                  61.14 ± 5.42

                  22.79 ± 1.29

                  Normal bone mass

                  31

                  77.15 ± 3.76

                  1.66 ± 0.06

                  61.54 ± 5.00

                  22.42 ± 1.55

                  Bone mineral density and serum preptin levels

                  We compared the BMD among the three groups. The L2-4, femur neck and total hip BMD of osteoporosis group were all lower than those of the osteopaenia group (P < 0.01). The same results could be seen between the osteopaenia group and the normal bone mass group (Table  2).
                  Table 2

                  BMD comparison among the three groups (Data are mean±SD)

                  Groups

                  Cases (n)

                  L2-4(g/cm2)

                  Femur Neck (g/cm2)

                  Total hip (g/cm2)

                  Osteoporosis

                  52

                  0.826 ± 0.080##

                  0. 598 ± 0.116##

                  0.698 ± 0.125##

                  Osteopenia

                  50

                  1.059 ± 0.066##**

                  0.769 ± 0.158##**

                  0.859 ± 0.154#**

                  Normal bone mass

                  31

                  1.338 ± 0.140**

                  0.896 ± 0.182**

                  0.968 ± 0.194**

                  Note: compared with the normal bone mass group, # p<0.05, ## p<0.01; compared with the osteoporosis group, ** p<0.01.

                  The serum preptin levels were further compared. The serum preptin level of the osteoporosis group was lower compared with that of the osteopaenia group (5.10 ng/mL ± 0.69 ng/mL vs. 7.09 ng/mL ± 1.36 ng/mL, P < 0.01). The serum preptin level of the osteopaenia group was lower compared with that of the normal bone mass group (7.09 ng/mL ± 1.36 ng/mL vs. 10.11 ng/mL ± 1.61 ng/mL, P < 0.01) (Table  3).
                  Table 3

                  Serum preptin levels (Data are mean±SD)

                  Groups

                  Cases (n)

                  Preptin (ng/mL)

                  Osteoporosis

                  52

                  5.10 ± 0.69##

                  Osteopenia

                  50

                  7.09 ± 1.36##**

                  Normal bone mass

                  31

                  10.11 ± 1.61**

                  Note: compared with the normal bone mass group, ## p<0.01; compared with the osteoporosis group, * p<0.05.

                  The preptin levels correlated positively with the L2-4 BMD (P < 0.001), the femur neck BMD (P < 0.001), and the total hip BMD (P < 0.001) (Figure  1). Serum preptin levels correlated with BMD was after adjusting for age and BMI.
                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-49/MediaObjects/12891_2012_1616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 1

                  There existed significantly positive correlation between serum preptin levels and all three BMD, that is, preptin levels correlated positively with L 2-4 BMD ( P <0.001), femur neck BMD ( P <0.001), and total hip BMD ( P <0.001).

                  Bone turnover and other biochemical parameters: correlation with preptin levels

                  The bone formation markers (B-ALP, BGP, and PINP) of the osteoporosis group were all lower than those of the osteopaenia group, and those of the osteopaenia group were lower than those in the normal bone mass group (Figure  2).
                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-49/MediaObjects/12891_2012_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 2

                  The serum preptin levels correlated positively with all of the three bone formation items (B-ALP, p<0.05; BGP, P <0.001; PINP, P <0.01).

                  The serum preptin levels correlated positively with B-ALP (r = 0.212, p = 0.014), BGP (r = 0.699, P < 0.001), and PINP (r = 0.266, p = 0.002), which was after adjusting for age and BMI.

                  No significant difference was observed in the bone resorption marker TRACP-5b among the three groups (P > 0.05). No correlation was observed with preptin levels (r = −0.018, p = 0.841).

                  Discussion

                  Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass accompanied by bone microarchitectural changes that increase fracture susceptibility [18, 19]. The precise balance between bone formation and resorption is critical for the maintenance of bone mass density (BMD) and systemic mineral homoeostasis [1, 2]. Osteoporosis is mainly caused by bone remodelling failure, which is regulated by many factors [2025].

                  As a novel hormone, preptin increases the bone area and mineralising surface in adult mice by stimulating osteoblast proliferation and reducing osteoblast apoptosis [15]. Therefore, preptin is involved in bone anabolism and contributes to bone mass preservation [15]. However, the function and mechanism of preptin in human osteoporosis remain unclear.

                  The current study found that preptin levels are correlated with BMD. The preptin level was the lowest in osteoporosis patients than in osteopaenia and normal bone mass subjects. The present study is the first to investigate preptin levels in subjects with different BMDs.

                  Bone formation markers were reduced in elderly male patients with osteoporosis and positively correlated with preptin levels. However, the bone resorption marker was not correlated with preptin levels. Lower circulating preptin was correlated with reduced osteogenesis, which is consistent with the characteristics of Type II (senile) osteoporosis (reduced bone formation and low bone turnover). Hence, preptin may be involved in Type II osteoporosis by affecting bone formation. Understanding these mechanisms will facilitate further research on bone remodelling and osteoporosis. Future investigations on the endogenous regulation of osteoblastogenesis will increase the current knowledge for developing potential drug targets for treating osteoporosis.

                  The present study has limitations that need to be considered. The cross-sectional design limits our ability to infer a causal relationship between reduced serum preptin level and low BMD. Our analyses are based on a single blood preptin measurement, which does not reflect the relationship between preptin levels and BMD over time. Measuring serial changes in blood preptin levels in preosteoporotic and osteoporotic subjects will further clarify the role of preptin in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Furthermore, the effects of oestrogen were not included. Hence, postmenopausal osteoporotic patients were excluded from the present study. Detecting the blood preptin levels in females and comparing them with male osteoporotic patients will help elucidate the differences in pathogenesis of osteoporosis between males and females.

                  Diabetes mellitus (DM) alters bone remodelling, and osteopaenia and osteoporosis are among its complications. High extracellular glucose concentrations act as an endogenous factor that increases biomineralisation degree but reduces mineral quality [23]. Preptin functions in the pathogenesis of Type II DM [14]. Thus, subjects with DM or hyperglycaemia were excluded.

                  Conclusion

                  The lower blood preptin levels in elderly male patients with osteoporosis suggest that preptin has a function in the pathogenesis of Type II osteoporosis. However, this finding needs to be clarified in further studies. Further in vivo experiments should determine whether preptin is a new target for treating osteoporosis by promoting bone formation.

                  Declarations

                  Acknowledgements

                  This work was partly funded by a Research Grant for Health Science and Technology development and innovation of Pudong New Area of Shanghai (Grant No. PKJ2011-Y06, Grant No. PKJ2011-Y31).

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  (1)
                  Department of Rheumatology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tong Ji University
                  (2)
                  Department of Geriatrics, Ningbo First People’s Hospital
                  (3)
                  Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo First People’s Hospital

                  References

                  1. Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C: Osteoporosis: impact on health and economics. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010, 6:99–105.PubMedView Article
                  2. Zuo C, Huang Y, Bajis R, Sahih M, Li YP, Dai K, et al.: Osteoblastogenesis regulation signals in bone remodeling. Osteoporos Int 2012, 23:1653–1663.PubMedView Article
                  3. Melton LJ 3rd: Epidemiology worldwide. Endocrinol Metab Clin 2003, 32:1–13.View Article
                  4. Rodan GA, Martin TJ: Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases. Science 2000, 289:1508–1514.PubMedView Article
                  5. Beil FT, Oheim R, Barvencik F, Hissnauer TN, Pestka JM, Ignatius A, et al.: Low Turnover Osteoporosis in Sheep Induced by Hypothalamic-Pituitary Disconnection. J Orthop Res 2012, 30:1254–1262.PubMedView Article
                  6. Magni P, Dozio E, Galliera E, Ruscica M, Corsi MM: Molecular Aspects of Adipokine-Bone Interactions. Curr Mol Med 2010, 10:522–532.PubMed
                  7. Canalis E, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP: Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:905–916.PubMedView Article
                  8. Khosla S, Westendorf JJ, Oursler MJ: Building bone to reverse osteoporosis and repair fractures. J Clin Invest 2008, 118:421–428.PubMedView Article
                  9. Cui L, Li T, Liu Y, Zhou L, Li P, Xu B, et al.: Salvianolic Acid B Prevents Bone Loss in Prednisone-Treated Rats through Stimulation of Osteogenesis and Bone Marrow Angiogenesis. PLoS One 2012, 7:e34647.PubMedView Article
                  10. Arantes HP, Barros ER, Kunii I, Bilezikian JP, Lazaretti-Castro M: Teriparatide Increases Bone Mineral Density in a Man with Osteoporosis Pseudoglioma. JBMR 2011, 26:2823–2826.View Article
                  11. Cooper GJ, Willis AC, Clark A, Turner RC, Sim RB, Reid KB: Purification and characterization of a peptide from amyloid-rich pancreases of type 2 diabetic patients. Natl Acad Sci USA 1987, 84:8628–8632.View Article
                  12. Buchanan CM, Phillips AR, Cooper GJ: Preptin derived from proinsulin-like growth factor II (proIGF-II) is secreted from pancreatic islet beta-cells and enhances insulin secretion. Biochem J 2001, 360:431–439.PubMedView Article
                  13. Liu YS, Lu Y, Liu W, Xie H, Luo XH, Wu XP, Yuan LQ, Liao EY: Connective tissue growth factor is a downstream mediator for preptin-induced proliferation and differentiation in human osteoblasts. Amino Acids 2010, 38:763–769.PubMedView Article
                  14. Yang GY, Li L, Chen WW, Liu H, Boden G, Li K: Circulating preptin levels in normal, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetic subjects. Ann Med 2009, 41:52–56.PubMedView Article
                  15. Cornish J, Callon KE, Bava U, Watson M, Xu X, Lin JM, et al.: Preptin, another peptide product of the pancreatic beta-cell, is osteogenic in vitro and in vivo. Am J Physiol Endoc M 2007, 292:E117-E122.
                  16. Eastell R: Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1998, 338:736–746.PubMedView Article
                  17. Legrand E, Chappard D, Pascaretti C, Duquenne M, Rondeau C, Simon Y, et al.: Bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in men. Osteoporos Int 1999, 10:265–270.PubMedView Article
                  18. Heaney RP: Pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin 1998, 27:255–265.View Article
                  19. Hurley DL, Khosla S: Update on primary osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 1997, 72:943–949.PubMed
                  20. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA: Osteoporosis in elderly men and women: Effects of dietary calcium, physical activity and body index. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15:322–331.PubMedView Article
                  21. Amling M, Takeda S, Karsenty G: A neuro (endo)crine regulation of bone remodeling. Bioessays 2000, 22:970–975.PubMedView Article
                  22. Chien KR, Karsenty G: Longevity and lineages: toward the integrative biology of degenerative diseases in heart, muscle, and bone. Cell 2005, 120:533–544.PubMedView Article
                  23. García-Hernández A, Arzate H, Gil-Chavarría I, Rojo R, Moreno-Fierros L: High glucose concentrations alter the biomineralization process in human osteoblastic cells. Bone 2012, 50:276–288.PubMedView Article
                  24. Reid IR: Fat and bone. Arch Biochem Biophys 2010, 503:20–27. Wong IPPubMedView Article
                  25. Baldock PA, Herzog H: Gastrointestinal peptides and bone health. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diab Obes 2010, 17:44–50.
                  26. Pre-publication history

                    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2474/​14/​49/​prepub

                  Copyright

                  © Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                  This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.