Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions
© Antonova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 February 2012
Accepted: 15 January 2013
Published: 26 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jenya Antonova|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Giannoudis|
|4 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Glinda Cooper|
|26 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jenya Antonova|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Glinda Cooper|
|5 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jenya Antonova|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|5 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|15 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-42|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.