Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparing radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty using one- vs. two-fluoroscopic technique

  • Yen-Yao Li1, 2Email author,
  • Tsung-Jen Huang1, 2,
  • Chin-Chang Cheng1, 2,
  • Meng-Huang Wu1 and
  • Ching-Yu Lee1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:38

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-38

Received: 25 July 2012

Accepted: 15 January 2013

Published: 22 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Mroz
28 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Panayiotakis
2 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yen-Yao Li
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Mroz
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-38

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
(2)
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University

Advertisement