Knee extension range of motion and self-report physical function in total knee arthroplasty: mediating effects of knee extensor strength
- Yong-Hao Pua†1Email author,
- Peck-Hoon Ong†1,
- Hwei-Chi Chong1,
- William Yeo2,
- Celia Tan3 and
- Ngai-Nung Lo4
© Pua et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 July 2012
Accepted: 15 January 2013
Published: 18 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlie Hicks-Little|
|9 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lone Ramer Mikkelsen|
|5 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Yong-Hao Pua|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lone Ramer Mikkelsen|
|10 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlie Hicks-Little|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.