Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Meta-analysis of the association of HLA-DRB1 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations

  • Meng Yang1,
  • Xiaocong Kuang2,
  • Jianmin Li3Email author,
  • Yanbin Pan3,
  • Meile Tan3,
  • Binzhu Lu3,
  • Qiumei Cheng3,
  • Lingyan Wu3 and
  • Guodong Pang3
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:307

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-307

Received: 20 May 2013

Accepted: 21 October 2013

Published: 27 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Individual studies have reported different results regarding the association of HLA alleles with RA in Chinese populations. This study was performed to systematically summarize results on the association of HLA-DRB1 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China.

Methods

We examined the case–control studies concerned about the relationship between HLA-DRB1and RA and differences of clinical and laboratory parameters between the HLA-DR4 (DR4)+ and DR4- in RA patients in Chinese populations. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to describe the relationship.

Results

22 studies with 1690 cases and 1793 controls were included. Chinese populations with RA had significantly higher frequencies of HLA-DRB1*04, *0401, *0404, *0405 and *0410 than controls (ORDRB1*04 =4.19, 95% CI =3.44–5.11, p<0.00001; ORDRB1*0401 =2.53, 95% CI =1.54–4.16, p=0.0003; ORDRB1*0404 =2.28, 95% CI =1.28–4.06, p=0.005; ORDRB1*0405=3.71, 95% CI =2.52–5.45, p<0.00001; ORDRB1*0410 =2.99, 95% CI =1.25–7.14, p=0.01respectively). As to laboratory parameters, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Rheumatoid factor (RF), Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (Anti-CCP ) in patients with DR4+ were higher than patients with DR4- (WMD=0.26, 95% CI =0.15–0.37, p<0.00001; WMD = 0.26, 95% CI =0.12–0.41, p=0.0005; WMD = 0.44, 95% CI =0.23–0.65, p<0.00001; WMD = 0.58, 95% CI =0.24–0.91, p=0.0007 respectively). As to clinical features, there was no difference in duration of morning stiffness, number of swollen joints, number of joint tenderness, X-ray phases and joint function between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients.

Conclusions

It was found that HLA-DRB1*04, *0401, *0404, *0405 and *0410 are risk factors for RA in Chinese populations. ESR, CRP, RF, Anti-CCP are different between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients in Chinese populations, while there’s no difference for indexes of clinical features.

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis HLA-DRB1 Laboratory parameters Meta-analysis

Background

RA is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the joints, which may lead to joint destruction and disability. It is the common chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in the world, with prevalence estimates of 0.25% to 0.5% [1]. Previous literature suggests that people with rheumatoid arthritis may live 10–15 years less than their healthy counterparts [2]. RA is a complex polygenic disease of unknown etiology. However, genetic variation is believed to be important in determining the susceptibility of RA. It was proven to be associated with (histocompatibility locus antigen) HLA region strongly, especially with HLA-DRB1 alleles [3].

HLA-DRB1 alleles encode (70Q(R)K(R)RAA74) encoding the shared epitope (SE) (RAA amino acid pattern in positions 72 to 74 of the third hypervariable region of the DRβ1 chain) are associated with RA susceptibility [4]. SE contains HLA-DRB1 alleles representing significant genetic risk factor for RA. Many studies have attempted to clarify the relationship between HLA-DRB1 and RA, but there has been no definite consensus to date in Chinese populations. Due to the relatively small numbers of patients or the ethnic and clinical heterogeneity of the patients, the results are different in many studies. Well-designed meta-analyses of Caucasian and American populations showed that there was a strong association between HLA-DRB1 and RA susceptibility and severity [5].

Individual studies have reported different results regarding the association of HLA alleles with RA in Chinese populations. Some have reported that the frequency of the HLA-DRB1*0401 and *0405 alleles are significantly increased in RA patients, whereas others have found no associations [6, 7]. Moreover, there were controversial results about differences of clinical and laboratory parameters between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients [8, 9].

This study was performed to systematically summarize the association between Chinese with RA and HLA-DRB1 alleles. It was also performed to investigate the differences of clinical and laboratory parameters between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients. The frequency of HLA-DRB1 alleles varies according to ethnic and racial background, with some alleles being extremely rare. Therefore, articles were not required to identify all alleles for inclusion.

Methods

Literature search and selection

The following databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG and Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index(VIP) databases were searched for available articles without language restrictions. The index terms that we used were: (“human leukocyte antigen” or “HLA”) and (“rheumatoid arthritis” or “RA”) and (“Chinese” or “China”). Last query was updated on 31 March, 2013. References of retrieved articles were cross-searched to identify any studies missed by the electronic search strategies.

Inclusion criteria

The studies which were fit into the meta-analysis was required to meet the following criteria: (1) the articles must be proven diagnosis of RA patients with standard criteria of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1987. (2) Study should be correlated with the RA and HLA-DRB1 in Chinese populations. (3) Study must be case–control design. (4) When multiple articles were published by the same authors or institutions, the most recent or informative single article was selected. (5) Articles lacking original data for meta-analysis, review articles were excluded.

Quality assessment of included studies

The quality of papers was independently assessed by two reviewers (Pan Yanbin and Tan Meile) based on the STROBE quality score systems [10]. Quality scores ranged from 0 to 30. We defined 10, 20 and 30 scores as low, moderate and high grade respectively. Articles with quality scores of 10 or less were excluded. Any discrepancies between the two reviewers were resolved by discussion and consultation with a third reviewer.

Data extraction

Data for this meta-analysis were extracted by two investigators (Li Jianmin and Wu Lingyan) independently and reached a consensus on the disagreement. Results would be arbitrated by a third reviewer (Yang Meng) if there were any disagreement. The extracted details included first author, year of publication, geographical region,study design, sample, source of cases and controls, frequency of HLA-DRB1 alleles, number of cases and controls, clinical feature, laboratory index and detection methods. The X-ray phases was according to standard of Steinbrocker classification for the joint function and joint function was measured by justification of triaxial goniometer. These geographical populations can be classified into northern Han Chinese (N-Han) and southern Han Chinese (S-Han), with the Yangtze River used as a geographical boundary. In the subgroup analysis, subjects of all included studies were divided into the southerners and northerners of China due to significantly geographic variation in Chinese populations.

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager version 5.2 (provided by The Cochrane Collaboration) and STATA package version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Dichotomous data were reported as OR (calculated by chi-square test) whereas continuous data were reported as WMD ± standard deviation (SD) (calculated by T test). The pooled OR or WMD together with the 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used for assessing the strength of association. The heterogeneity among studies was judged by I [2] statistics. It ranges between 0 and 100% and I [2] values of 25, 50 and 75% were defined as low, moderate and high estimates, respectively. When a significant I [2] >50% indicated heterogeneity across studies, the random effects model was used for meta-analysis, or else the fixed effects model was used [11]. Besides, sensitivity analyses were utilized to evaluate the stability of the results. And the potential publication bias was assessed by the Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test [12]. Statistical significance was considered when the P value of the test was <0.05. All P values were two-sided.

Results

With our inclusion criteria, a total of 489 references were retrieved for initial review using search strategies as described. 239 citations were excluded from analysis after the first screening based on abstracts or titles. After exclusion of the articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, we identified 40 potential studies for detail evaluation. Upon further review, 18 articles were eliminated due to the following reasons: 3 studies overlapped with others; 15 studies didn’t provide sufficient data about HLA-DRB1 alleles frequency on cases and/or controls or lacked clinical feature or laboratory indexes data to create for meta-analysis. Finally, 22 studies performed on the association of HLA-DRB1 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations were included and analyzed. Selection process for the studies included in the meta-analysis is summarized in Figure 1. The main features of eligible studies in our meta-analysis are summarized in Tables 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Selection process for the studies included in the Meta-analysis.

Table 1

Main characteristics of the 22 studies included in the final meta-analysis

Author(reference)

Year

Region

Source of cases

Source of controls

Detection methods

Number of cases

Number of controls

Quality score

Ye SX [13]

1989

Liaoning

Hospital-based

Population-based

NS

39

100

22

Molkentin, J [14]

1993

Shanghai

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

23

21

26

Zhu NS [15]

1994

Shanghai

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-RFLP

95

130

24

Wang BL [16]

1996

Anhui

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

30

30

17

Xiao Z [17]

1997

Inner Mongolia

Hospital-based

Population-based

NS

41

50

16

Zhao Y [18]

1997

Beijing

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

86

106

21

Gu JR [19]

1998

Guangdong

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

47

108

23

Yuan GH [8]

1998

Beijing

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-RFLP

35

100

23

Zhang JQ [20]

1999

Hebei

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

180

100

25

Liu QH [6]

2000

Hubei

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

78

126

26

Wu H [21]

2001

Hunan

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

105

76

32

Lin L[22]

2001

Guangdong

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

117

100

21

Liu YJ [23]

2002

Guizhou

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

35

51

22

Li XF [9]

2003

Shandong

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

132

130

31

Zhang SL[24]

2003

Fujian

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

98

100

21

Su Y [25]

2004

Beijing

Hospital-based

Hospital-based

PCR-SSP

136

79

24

Duan JM [26]

2005

Anhui

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

25

77

23

Zhang HW [7]

2005

Guangdong

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

22

31

22

Chen CP [27]

2010

Shanxi

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

42

14

21

Wang CF [28]

2010

Gansu

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

27

46

21

Chang ZF [29]

2012

Inner Mongolia

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

140

100

23

Shi YM [30]

2012

Xinjiang

Hospital-based

Population-based

PCR-SSP

157

118

21

'PCR-SSP’ stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction-Sequence-Specific Primers, 'PCR-RFLP’ stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymor Phism and 'NS’ corresponds to not stated.

Association of DRB1 alleles with RA susceptibility

These 22 case–control studies selected included a total of 1690 RA cases and 1793 healthy controls. A total of 12 alleles were assayed in the studies: HLA-DRB1*01,*0101,*0102(DR1); HLA-DRB1*04,*0401,*0402,*0404,*0405,*0408,*0409 and *0410(DR4); HLA-DRB1*10(DR10). The most common polymorphisms were DRB1*0405. Summary of the meta-analysis findings of the association between HLA-DRB1 alleles and RA is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Summary of the meta-analysis findings of the association between HLA-DRB1 alleles and RA

Polymorphisms

Eligible studies

RA Case n/N

Control n/N

OR (95% CI)

p–value

Heterogeneity test

Effect model

HLA–DRB1*04

12

489/965

240/1166

4.19 (3.44 – 5.11)

<0.00001

p=0.93, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

5

248/528

111/566

3.67 (2.78 – 4.84)

<0.00001

p=0.96, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

7

241/437

129/600

4.83 (3.64 – 6.4)

<0.00001

p=0.86, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0401

10

54/733

24/814

2.53 (1.54 – 4.16)

0.0003

p=0.91, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

5

31/397

16/390

2 (1.06 – 3.79)

0.003

p=0.87, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

5

23/336

8/424

3.59 (1.6 – 8.06)

0.002

p=0.78, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0402

1

4/287

2/196

1.41 (0.31 – 6.42)

0.65

p=0.75, I [2]=0%

Fixed

HLA–DRB1*0404

10

44/733

19/814

2.28 (1.28 – 4.06)

0.005

p=0.91, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

5

31/397

10/390

2.46 (1.14 – 5.28)

0.02

p=0.75, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

5

13/336

9/424

2.06 (0.85 – 4.94)

0.11

p=0.72, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0405

11

240/913

91/914

3.71 (2.52 – 5.45)

<0.00001

p=0.10, I [2]=38%

Random

  Northerner

6

142/577

54/490

3.17 (1.84 – 5.48)

<0.00001

p=0.11, I [2]=44%

 

  Southerner

5

98/336

37/424

4.56 (2.69 – 7.73)

<0.00001

p=0.26, I [2]=25%

 

HLA–DRB1*0408

9

16/620

7/757

2.24 (0.94 – 5.34)

0.07

p=0.77, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

5

13/295

5/350

2.27 (0.82 – 6.29)

0.12

p=0.51, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

4

3/325

2/407

2.18 (0.42 – 11.3)

0.35

p=0.63, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0409

8

8/578

3/743

2.78 (0.92 – 8.42)

0.07

p=0.43, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

4

6/253

2/336

3.28 (0.85 – 12.57)

0.08

p=0.22, I [2]=35%

 

  Southerner

4

2/325

1/407

1.91 (0.26 – 13.95)

0.53

p=0.93, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0410

8

15/578

7/743

2.99 (1.25 – 7.14)

0.01

p=0.93, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

4

4/253

1/336

3.96 (0.71 – 22.12)

0.12

p=0.92, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

4

11/325

6/407

2.7 (0.98 – 7.42)

0.05

p=0.58, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*01

8

45/557

45/785

1.35 (0.87 – 2.11)

0.18

p=0.87, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

4

25/292

27/436

1.45 (0.8 – 2.61)

0.22

p=0.63, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

4

20/265

18/349

1.23 (0.62 – 2.45)

0.55

p=0.72, I [2]=0%

 

HLA–DRB1*0101

1

9/245

9/356

1.48 (0.57 – 3.84)

0.42

p=0.92, I [2]=0%

Fixed

HLA–DRB1*0102

1

4/245

5/356

1.08 (0.3 – 3.9)

0.9

p=0.95, I [2]=0%

Fixed

HLA–DRB1*10

5

20/417

18/538

1.3 (0.67 – 2.52)

0.43

p=0.69, I [2]=0%

Fixed

  Northerner

3

16/253

14/336

1.34 (0.64 – 2.84)

0.44

p=0.44, I [2]=0%

 

  Southerner

2

4/164

4/202

1.17 (0.29 – 4.71)

0.82

p=0.43, I [2]=0%

 

'n’ stands for number of positive events, 'N’ stands for number of total events.

The ORs showed that Chinese patients with RA had significantly higher frequencies of HLA-DRB1*04 (Figure 2), *0401, *0404, *0405 (Figure 3) and *0410 (ORDRB1*04 =4.19, 95% CI =3.44–5.11, p<0.00001; ORDRB1*0401 =2.53, 95% CI =1.54–4.16, p=0.0003; ORDRB1*0404=2.28, 95% CI =1.28–4.06, p=0.005; ORDRB1*0405=3.71,95%CI=2.52–5.45, p<0.00001; ORDRB1*0410=2.99,95% CI=1.25–7.14, p=0.01 respectively).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Meta analysis of the association of HLA-DRB1*04 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Meta analysis of the association of HLA-DRB1*0405 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations.

However, HLA-DRB1*0408,*0409,*01,*0101,*0102 and *10 showed no association with susceptibility to RA in Chinese populations (ORDRB1*0408 =2.24, 95% CI =0.94–5.34, p=0.07; ORDRB1*0409 =2.24, 95% CI =0.94–5.34, p=0.07; ORDRB1*01 =1.35, 95% CI =0.87–2.11, p=0.18; ORDRB1*0101 =1.48, 95% CI=0.57–3.84, p=0.42; ORDRB1*0102=1.08,95%CI=0.3–3.9, p=0.9; ORDRB1*10=1.3, 95% CI =0.67–2.52, p=0.43 respectively).

Results of subgroup analysis showed that there was a positive association between DRB1*0404 and susceptibility to RA in the northerners (OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.14–5.28), but not in the southerners (OR =2.06, 95% CI=0.85–4.94). Results of subgroup analysis showed that there was a higher susceptibility of DRB1*04,*0401,*0405 in the southerners than in the northerners of China. No association was found between DRB1*0408, *0409, *01,*0101, *0102 and *10 and susceptibility to RA both in the southerners and northerners of China.

Differences of clinical and laboratory parameters between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients

Chi-square test or T test was took to evaluate the balance of average age, gender and disease duration of included studies, there were not obvious imbalance of the baseline for them. We contacted the original authors to get data of treatments and sensitivity of the scale of X-ray. There were not obvious imbalance of the baseline for them too. A summary of the meta-analysis findings of the association between DR4+ and DR4-in RA patients is shown in Table 3. As to laboratory parameters, ESR (Figure 4), CRP (Figure 5), RF, Anti-CCP in patients with DR4+ were higher than patients with DR4- (WMD=0.26, 95% CI =0.15–0.37, p<0.00001; WMD = 0.26, 95% CI =0.12–0.41, p=0.0005; WMD = 0.44, 95% CI =0.23–0.65, p<0.00001; WMD = 0.58, 95% CI =0.24–0.91, p=0.0007 respectively).
Table 3

Summary of the meta-analysis findings of the differences of clinical and laboratory parameters between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients

Polymorphisms

Eligible studies

Baseline comparability

Case (N or n/N) DR4+

Control (N or n/N) DR4-

WMD/OR (95% CI)

p–value

Heterogeneity test

Effect model

ESR

10

Yes

590

762

0.26 (0.15, 0.37)

<0.00001

p=0.16, I [2]=31%

Fixed

  Northerner

7

Yes

458

562

0.22 [0.09, 0.35]

0.0007

p=0.13, I [2]=40%

 

  Southerner

3

Yes

132

200

0.39 [0.17, 0.61]

0.0006

p=0.16, I [2]=31%

 

CRP

6

Yes

325

436

0.26 [0.12, 0.41]

0.0005

p=0.11, I [2]=44%

Fixed

RF

4

Yes

139

246

0.44 [0.23, 0.65]

<0.00001

p=0.42, I [2]=0%

Fixed

Anti-CCP

2

Yes

52

123

0.58 [0.24, 0.91]

0.0007

p=0.28, I [2]=15%

Fixed

Duration of morning stiffness

5

Yes

228

337

0.23 [-0.01, 0.48]

0.06

p=0.11, I [2]=47%

Fixed

Number of swollen joints

7

Yes

414

527

0.13 [-0.00, 0.26]

0.05

p=0.29, I [2]=18%

Fixed

Number of joint tenderness

6

Yes

368

437

0.08 [-0.06, 0.23]

0.25

p=0.67, I [2]=0%

Fixed

X-ray phases

8

Yes

137/368*

142/365*

0.93 (0.66–1.29)’

0.65

p=0.1, I [2]=42%

Fixed

  I ~ II

3

Yes

44/108*

63/135*

0.47 (0.26–0.87)’

0.02

p=0.75, I [2]=0%

 

  III ~ IV

5

Yes

93/260*

79/230*

1.27 (0.84–1.92)’

0.25

p=0.26, I [2]=25%

 

Joint function

8

Yes

93/260*

79/230*

0.89 (0.65–1.23)’

0.6

p=0.02, I [2]=58%

Random

  I ~ II

3

Yes

124/364*

182/463*

0.59 (0.35–1)’

0.05

p=0.51, I [2]=0%

 

  III ~ IV

5

Yes

56/149*

96/170*

1.14 (0.76–1.69)’

0.88

p=0.02, I [2]=65%

 

'n’ stands for number of positive events, 'N’ stands for number of total events.

* n/N.

'OR (95%CI).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Meta analysis of the differences of ESR between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Meta analysis of the differences of CRP between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients.

As to clinical features, there was no difference in duration of morning stiffness, number of swollen joints and number of joint tenderness between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients (WMD=0.23,95% CI=-0.01–0.48, p=0.06;WMD=0.13,95% CI=-0.00–0.26, p=0.05;WMD=0.08,95% CI=-0.06–0.23, p=0.25 respectively). There was no difference in X-ray phases (Figure 6) and joint function between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients (OR =0.93, 95% CI =0.66–1.29, p=0.65; OR = 0.89, 95% CI =0.65–1.23, p=0.6 respectively).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Meta analysis of the differences of X-ray phases between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients.

Results of subgroup analysis showed that there was a positive association between DRB1*0404 and X-ray phases to RA in phases I~II (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.26–0.87), but not in the phases III~IV (OR =1.27, 95% CI=0.84, 1.92).

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

The sensitivity analyses revealed that none of the studies significantly affected the pooled ORs and CIs.When each study is sequentially removed and the pooled ORs remain almost the same. The funnel plot to detect publication bias showed relatively symmetric for most alleles (e.g. Figure 7 Funnel plot for the association of HLA-DRB1*0405 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations), except for ESR. Moreover, the regression asymmetry test did not reveal significant evidence for publication bias (Egger p=0.348).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-307/MediaObjects/12891_2013_Article_1930_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Funnel plot for the association of HLA-DRB1*0405 with rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese populations.

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, 12 HLA-DRB1 polymorphisms were addressed and evaluated. Our meta-analysis results showed that there was a positive association between HLA-DRB1*04, *0401, *0404, *0405 and *0410 and susceptibility to RA, which indicated that they may be potential risk factors for RA in Chinese populations. The SE hypothesis indicated that these genes encoding the third hypervariable region of the DR antigen amino acid and the sequence are QKRAA, or QRRAA or RRRAA [31]. It is based on the assumption that class II molecules are directly involved in the etiology and pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. The initiation of an immune response requires T cell activation, and such activation requires the presence of both antigen and HLA-DRB1 on antigen presenting cells. Many current studies assume that some direct physical interaction between class II molecules and T cell receptor or antigen is involved in this process. The SE hypothesis assumes that structural differences between class II molecules can influence the interaction, either at the level of antigen presentation or during T cell differentiation in the thymus [32].

Teller found that the “shared” DRB1 amino acid sequence was relatively infrequent in the Hispanic American patients with RA which may not be useful in other ethnic groups [33]. This study may supplement data of association of DRB1 in Chinese populations.

In the subgroup analysis by geographic distribution, results showed that DRB1*0404 might be a potential risk factor for RA in the northerners of China rather than southerners. It showed that there was a higher susceptibility of DRB1*04,*0401,*0405 in the southerners than in the northerners of China. However as to DRB1*0404, it had an opposite result. All these may suggest a possible role of geographic differences in genetic backgrounds and the environment they lived in.

Summary of the meta-analysis findings of the association between DR4+ and DR4-in RA patients was shown in Table 3. As to laboratory parameters, ESR, CRP, RF, Anti-CCP in patients with DR4+ were higher which indicate the serious condition, poor prognosis and difficulty to alleviate in patients with DR4+. As to clinical features, there was no difference in duration of morning stiffness, number of swollen joints, joint function and number of joint tenderness between the DR4+ and DR4- in RA patients, the mechanism about it should be further explored.

Results of subgroup analysis show that there was a positive association between DRB1*0404 and X-ray phases to RA in phases I~II, but not in the phases III~IV. It suggests that the DR4+ patients with bone erosion may occur at an early stage.

We also found that the most common polymorphism was DRB1*0405 in Chinese population. While DRB1*0401 and DRB1*0402 were the most common polymorphismss in white population and Jews [34]. The role of the various subtypes in RA susceptibility were different in different populations and the constitute of susceptibility and non-susceptibility subsets were also different. Therefore, studies of RA-related genes should be on the basis of region, nationality and the sample should be expanded and more associated genes should be tested at the same time. We should also improve the typing technology, making a comprehensive analysis of the patients with RA. This will benefit to the revealment of the pathogenesis, early diagnosis and the prevention and control of RA.

Several limitations of the current studies could not be ignored. First, although we did not detect significant publication bias except for ESR between studies, it is uncertain whether the cases are comparably representative, and they are observational studies, more prone to many biases than prospective randomized controlled studies [35]. We found publication bias for ESR, there may be missing information which reflected “negative” or more conservative association of ESR with DR4.It need more samples to validate the reliability of our conclusions. Secondly, we distinguish the geographical populations into N-Han and S-Han with the Yangtze River serving as a geographical boundary, however the way to distinguish them is complicated which may lead to an inflated rate of false-positive results [36]. Thirdly, we were not able to perform subgroup for each polymorphism due to the limited number of published studies. Fourthly, our systematic review was based on unadjusted data, as the alleles information stratified for the main confounding variables was not available in the original papers. Although we actively contacted with the authors, we did not got a comprehensive set of data. Fifthly, we were not able to stratify our analyses according to the presence of anti-CCP antibodies. Chun-Lai found that different DRB1 SE alleles are common in Asian patients. These alleles confer a significant risk of developing ACPA-positive RA, but not ACPA-negative RA (i.e., in three Asian populations from Malaysia) [37]. Fisher et al. found that HLA-DRB1 SE was associated with both ACPA positive and negative RA, in a Korean population, but that there was a particularly strong interaction of smoking and HLA- DRB1 SE alleles that associated with ACPA fine-specificity [38, 39]. Finally, although all cases and controls of each study were well defined with similar inclusion criteria, there may be potential factors that were not taken into account that may have influenced our results.

As not enough studies were available in this field and current evidence remains limited. Therefore, it should be emphasised the necessity to conduct more studies with an adequate methodological quality, properly controlling for possible confounds in order to obtain a more valid result.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis shows that HLA-DRB1*04, *0401, *0404, *0405 and *0410 are associated with RA, while DRB1*0405 is the most common polymorphism in Chinese populations. ESR, CRP, RF, Anti-CCP in patients with DR4+ were higher than DR4-, whereas there’s no difference for indexes of clinical features.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by [the Funds for Guangxi zhuang autonomous region science and technology hall] grant number [1140003B-86]. Fang Jinju was acknowledged for providing writing assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Postgraduate School of Guangxi Medical University
(2)
Department of pathophysiology of Guangxi Medical University
(3)
Department of Dermatology, the third affiliated hospital of Guangxi Medical University

References

  1. Reginster JY: The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology. 2002, 41 (suppl 1): 3-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma J: The global burden of disease: 2004 update: World Health Organization. 2008Google Scholar
  3. Benbouazza K, Benchekroun B, Rkain H: Profile and course of early rheumatoid arthritis in Morocco: a two-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011, 12 (1): 266-10.1186/1471-2474-12-266.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu X, Guo J, Jia Y: Predominantly Associated with Both Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptides (CCPs) antibodies–Positive and–Negative Rheumatoid Arthritis in Han Population.
  5. Jun KR, Choi S-E, Cha C-H: Meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DRB1 allele and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility in Asian populations. J Korean Med Sci. 2007, 22 (6): 973-980. 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.6.973.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu QH, Teng Y: Relation between shared epitope of HLA-DR antigen B chain and rheumatoid arthritis. Chinese J Rheumatol. 2000, 4 (3): 153-155.Google Scholar
  7. Zhang HW, Chen GQ, Yan MX: HLA DR4 genes and clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Guangdong Med J. 2005, 26 (11): 1518-1519.Google Scholar
  8. Yuan GH, Shi GY: Molecular analysis of HLA-DRB polymorphism in Han nationality patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Med J China. 1998, 78 (3): 172-174.Google Scholar
  9. Li XF, Zhang F, Pan ZL: Association between rheumatoid arthritis and shared epitope of HLA2DRB1 gene in Shandong population. J Rheumatol. 2003, 7 (9): 531-536.Google Scholar
  10. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP: Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007, 36 (3): 666-676. 10.1093/ije/dym018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hui M, Doherty M, Zhang W: Does smoking protect against osteoarthritis? Meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011, 70 (7): 1231-1237. 10.1136/ard.2010.142323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee YH, Song GG: Meta-analysis of the family-based association between the PTPN22 C1858T polymorphism and Type 1 diabetes. Mol Biol Rep. 2013, 40 (1): 211-215. 10.1007/s11033-012-2051-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ye SX, Liu WQ: Han HLA antigens and rheumatoid arthritis. Chinese J Hematol. 1989, 10 (6): 287-87.Google Scholar
  14. Molkentin J, Gregersen PK, Lin X: Molecular analysis of HLA-DR beta and DQ beta polymorphism in Chinese with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993, 52 (8): 610-612. 10.1136/ard.52.8.610.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhu NS, Wang YX, Wang FQ: Chinese population of HLA-DR4 allele and its correlation with rheumatoid arthritis. Natl Med J China. 1994, 74 (7): 428-430.Google Scholar
  16. Wang BL, Gao P, Li XP: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis HLA-DR4 allele detection. Chinese J Clin Lab Sci. 1996, 14 (4): 196-96.Google Scholar
  17. Xiao Z, Gong L: The relationship between HLA-DR4 and rheumatoid arthritis in the han population of Inner Mongolia. Acta Academiae Med Neimongo. 1997, 19 (3): 57-57.Google Scholar
  18. Zhao Y, Dong Y, Tang FL: HLA-DRB1 allele and relationship of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in north of China. Chinese J Intern Med. 1997, 36 (2): 112-115.Google Scholar
  19. Gu JR, Sun CG: The relationship betweenHLA-DRB1 and rheumatoid arthritis in the han population of Guangdong. Chinese J Microbiol Immunol. 1998, 18 (3): 227-229.Google Scholar
  20. Zhang JQ, Wang JK: HLA-DR4 genetic testing in rheumatoid arthritis disease Chinese. J Rheumatol. 1999, 3 (3): 183-185.Google Scholar
  21. Wu H, Gao JS, Li M: HLA DR4 alleles and rheumatoid arthritis curative effect. Chinese J Rheumatol. 2001, 5 (4): 213-215.Google Scholar
  22. Lin L, Zeng Q, Liu SY: HLA-DRB1 Alleles Genotyping in Patients of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Shantou. J shantou med college. 2001, 14 (1): 22-24.Google Scholar
  23. Liu YJ, Liu RY, Zhang AH: HLA-DR4 subtype polymorphism of Han rheumatoid arthritis patients In Guizhou. Chinese J Rheumatol. 2002, 6 (6): 447-448.Google Scholar
  24. Zhang SL, Ye DF, Zheng L: The relationship between HLA-DR4 and rheumatoid arthritis in the han population of FuJian. Fujian Med J. 2003, 25 (1): 75-76.Google Scholar
  25. Su Y, Li ZG, Jia RL: The relationship between amino-acid motif of HLA-DRB1*04 (B chain) and the susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Chinese J Rheumatol. 2004, 8 (4): 215-219.Google Scholar
  26. Duan JM, Li ZJ, Wang RM: Relationship between HLA-DR4 Antigen Gene and Rheumatoid Arthritis in North of Anhui Province. Appl J Gen Pract. 2005, 2 (9): 12-13.Google Scholar
  27. Chen CP, He LF, Cheng T: HLA-DR4 gene and its subtypes associated with rheumatoid arthritis disease. Chinese Remedies & Clinics. 2010, 002: 157-158.Google Scholar
  28. Wang CF, Shen HL, Wang J: The relationship between HLA -DR4 gene and progressive rheumatoid arthritis in Han people of Gansu province. Gansu Med J. 2010, 29 (002): 127-129.Google Scholar
  29. Chang ZF, Wang YF, Shi XX: The Relationship between Antigen Epitope of HLA-DRB1 and Rheumatoid Arthritis. J baotou medical college. 2012, 28 (3): 12-15.Google Scholar
  30. Shi YM, Luo CN, Wang AX: Association of HLA-DR4 gene with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Uygur nationality of Xinjiang region. J Clin Intern Med. 2012, 29 (7): 490-492.Google Scholar
  31. de Vries N, Tijssen H, van Riel PL, van de Putte L: Reshaping the shared epitope hypothesis: HLA‒associated risk for rheumatoid arthritis is encoded by amino acid substitutions at positions 67–74 of the HLA–DRB1 molecule. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46 (4): 921-928. 10.1002/art.10210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gregersen PK, Silver J, Winchester RJ: The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987, 30 (11): 1205-1213. 10.1002/art.1780301102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Teller K, Budhai L, Zhang M, Haramati N, Keiser H, Davidson A: HLA-DRB1 and DQB typing of Hispanic American patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the“shared epitope” hypothesis may not apply. J Rheumatol. 1996, 23 (8): 1363-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zanelli E, Breedveld F, de Vries RR: HLA class II association with rheumatoid arthritis: facts and interpretations. Hum Immunol. 2000, 61 (12): 1254-1261. 10.1016/S0198-8859(00)00185-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mak A, Cheung MW, Ho RC, Cheak AA, Lau CS: Bisphosphonates and atrial fibrillation: Bayesian meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009, 10 (1): 113-10.1186/1471-2474-10-113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu S, Yin X, Li S: Genomic dissection of population substructure of Han Chinese and its implication in association studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2009, 85 (6): 762-774. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Chun-Lai T, Padyukov L, Dhaliwal JS: Shared epitope alleles remain a risk factor for anti-citrullinated proteins antibody (ACPA)–positive rheumatoid arthritis in three Asian ethnic groups. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (6): e21069-10.1371/journal.pone.0021069.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Fisher BA, Bang S-Y, Chowdhury M: Smoking, the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope and ACPA fine-specificity in Koreans with rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for more than one pathogenic pathway linking smoking to disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahdi H, Fisher BA, Källberg H: Specific interaction between genotype, smoking and autoimmunity to citrullinated α-enolase in the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2009, 41 (12): 1319-1324. 10.1038/ng.480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/14/307/prepub

Copyright

© Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.