Prevalence of claims-based recurrent low back pain in a Canadian population: A secondary analysis of an administrative database
© Beaudet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 January 2013
Accepted: 19 April 2013
Published: 29 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nicolas Beaudet|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Pillastrini|
|25 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Leggat|
|26 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - fahad alkherayf|
|14 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nicolas Beaudet|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Pillastrini|
|30 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Leggat|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-151|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.