Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease
- Lars G Johnsen†1, 2, 3Email author,
- Christian Hellum4,
- Øystein P Nygaard1, 3, 7,
- Kjersti Storheim4, 6,
- Jens I Brox4,
- Ivar Rossvoll1, 2, 3,
- Gunnar Leivseth5 and
- Margreth Grotle†8, 9
© Johnsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 14 May 2012
Accepted: 19 April 2013
Published: 26 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henrik Hein Lauridsen|
|4 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manuela Ferreira|
|26 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Gunnar Johnsen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henrik Hein Lauridsen|
|19 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manuela Ferreira|
|13 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Gunnar Johnsen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-14-148|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.