Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improved health outcomes with Etanercept versus usual DMARD therapy in an Asian population with established rheumatoid arthritis

  • Sang-Cheol Bae1,
  • Suk Chyn Gun2,
  • Chi Chiu Mok3,
  • Rezaul Khandker4,
  • Henk W Nab5,
  • Andrew S Koenig4,
  • Bonnie Vlahos4,
  • Ron Pedersen4 and
  • Amitabh Singh4Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:13

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-13

Received: 3 May 2012

Accepted: 17 December 2012

Published: 8 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joern Kekow
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - yi liu
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Amitabh Singh
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
Department of Medicine, Hospital Tuanku Ja’afar Seremban
Department of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital
Pfizer Inc., Specialty Care Business Unit
Pfizer Inc, Europe