Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures

  • Gertrud M Nilsson1Email author,
  • Magnus Eneroth2 and
  • Charlotte S Ekdahl1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201314:109

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109

Received: 31 May 2012

Accepted: 20 March 2013

Published: 25 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanja Nauck
30 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Gardner
7 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Gertrud Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanja Nauck
19 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Gertrud Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physical Therapy, Lund University
(2)
Department of Orthopaedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University

Advertisement