Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Embracing additive manufacture: implications for foot and ankle orthosis design

  • Scott Telfer1Email author,
  • Jari Pallari2,
  • Javier Munguia3,
  • Kenny Dalgarno3,
  • Martin McGeough4 and
  • Jim Woodburn1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201213:84

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-84

Received: 18 January 2012

Accepted: 29 May 2012

Published: 29 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosemary Dubbeldam
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisa Schrank
17 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Scott Telfer
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 May 2012 Editorially accepted
29 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-84

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University
Peacocks Medical Group Ltd
School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University
Firefly Orthoses Ltd