Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

  • Julian JZ Prokopetz1,
  • Elena Losina1, 2, 3,
  • Robin L Bliss4,
  • John Wright1, 2,
  • John A Baron5 and
  • Jeffrey N Katz1, 2, 6, 7Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201213:251

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-251

Received: 26 April 2012

Accepted: 5 December 2012

Published: 15 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rajiv Gandhi
21 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neil Sheth
5 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeffrey Katz
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
5 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
15 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-251

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
(2)
Harvard Medical School
(3)
Boston University School of Public Health
(4)
Veristat, Inc
(5)
University of North Carolina
(6)
Harvard School of Public Health
(7)
Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Advertisement