The impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism on the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy
© Kincse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 May 2012
Accepted: 6 December 2012
Published: 10 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - János Gaál|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giulio Pioli|
|23 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Amerling|
|16 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salvatore Maria Corsello|
|17 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Giusti|
|2 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - János Gaál|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Giusti|
|1 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giulio Pioli|
|4 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salvatore Maria Corsello|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-244|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.