Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey
© Karayannis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 April 2011
Accepted: 20 February 2012
Published: 20 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alice Kvale|
|8 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood|
|9 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill|
|23 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Karayannis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Hill|
|13 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood|
|22 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Karayannis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.