Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study

  • Bas Kluitenberg1Email author,
  • Steef W Bredeweg1,
  • Sjouke Zijlstra1,
  • Wiebren Zijlstra2, 3 and
  • Ida Buist1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201213:235

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-235

Received: 22 May 2012

Accepted: 1 November 2012

Published: 27 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
22 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Hreljac
21 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Riley
3 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Bas Kluitenberg
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Hreljac
24 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Riley
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
27 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-235

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen
Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen
Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne