Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis
© Linder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 December 2011
Accepted: 31 October 2012
Published: 16 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Roland Linder|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexander Katalinic|
|29 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Birgitte Espehaug|
|7 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Roland Linder|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexander Katalinic|
|3 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Birgitte Espehaug|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-223|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.