Quality of life after pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a gamma nail: a single center study of 62 patients
- Christian Giessauf†1,
- Mathias Glehr†2Email author,
- Gerwin A Bernhardt3,
- Franz J Seibert1,
- Karl Gruber4,
- Patrick Sadoghi2,
- Andreas Leithner2 and
- Gerald Gruber2
© Giessauf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 October 2011
Accepted: 17 October 2012
Published: 30 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dale Williams|
|28 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mathias Glehr|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel|
|17 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dale Williams|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-214|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.