Relationship between radiological grading and clinical status in knee osteoarthritis. a multicentric study
© Hernández-Vaquero and Fernández-Carreira; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 December 2011
Accepted: 3 October 2012
Published: 9 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone|
|31 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fulvia Ceccarelli|
|20 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone|
|7 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fulvia Ceccarelli|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-13-194|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.