Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages

  • Mario Cabraja1Email author,
  • Soner Oezdemir1,
  • Daniel Koeppen1 and
  • Stefan Kroppenstedt1
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders201213:172

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-172

Received: 23 April 2012

Accepted: 7 September 2012

Published: 14 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isaacl Moss
23 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ilker Eyupoglu
25 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - christian-andreas Mueller
28 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mario Cabraja
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-13-172

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Advertisement