Reliability and validity of ultrasound imaging of features of knee osteoarthritis in the community
© Abraham et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 October 2010
Accepted: 6 April 2011
Published: 6 April 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingrid Moller|
|1 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone|
|20 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ajay Abraham|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Perricone|
|3 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingrid Moller|
|21 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ajay Abraham|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ajay Abraham|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|29 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|6 Apr 2011||Editorially accepted|
|6 Apr 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-12-70|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.