Does pre-operative psychological distress affect patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty?
- Munier Hossain†1Email author,
- Daniel J Parfitt†1,
- David J Beard†2,
- Clare Darrah†3,
- John Nolan†3,
- David W Murray†2 and
- Glynne Andrew†1
© Hossain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 November 2010
Accepted: 1 June 2011
Published: 1 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Nov 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephan Doering|
|29 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eva Vingård|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eva Vingård|
|20 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Munier Hossain|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-12-122|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.