A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint
© Achten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 3 November 2009
Accepted: 14 January 2010
Published: 14 January 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Nov 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Juul Achten|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Juul Achten|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jan 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-11-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.