Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial
© Schofer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 12 May 2010
Accepted: 8 October 2010
Published: 8 October 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 May 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rene Verdonk|
|20 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - HENDRIK PIETER Delport|
|25 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Reynders|
|11 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Block|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Block|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|8 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-11-229|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.