Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study
© Jordan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 18 November 2009
Accepted: 2 July 2010
Published: 2 July 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Nov 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prawit Janwantanakul|
|3 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anita Feleus|
|20 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Jordan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prawit Janwantanakul|
|23 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anita Feleus|
|29 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Jordan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Jordan|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Jul 2010||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jul 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-11-144|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.