A within-subjects trial to test the equivalence of online and paper outcome measures: the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
© Bishop et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 1900
Received: 15 December 2009
Accepted: 8 June 2010
Published: 8 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henrik Hein Lauridsen|
|5 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chad Gwaltney|
|29 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Felicity Bishop|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chad Gwaltney|
|26 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henrik Hein Lauridsen|
|7 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Felicity Bishop|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-11-113|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.